Conservative Blogger David Frum Sticks it to Newt Gingrich

Read Time:3 Minute, 49 Second

It’s not so much that I am a hard core liberal; it’s that modern day American conservatives are so damn intolerable. When I hear the venomous spew flowing forth from the mouths of Fox News pundits, I can’t help but to wonder, are they that stupid, or that sinister? Are they stupid in the sense that they are in such poor command of the facts that they can’t analyze a matter without completely missing the mark? Or is it that they know better and are deliberately twisting facts, and falsely coloring their analysis with the intent to misinform scared, white people to vote for conservative extremist?

David Frum, a long time conservative, and former speech writer for President George W. Bush, appears to be the kind of conservative that is sorely needed in this day and time. He is the kind that isn’t scared to show that he can think on his own, and has the courage to stray from the daily conservative talking points memo. Of course, it was this kind of behavior that allegedly got him fired from his posh job at the American Enterprise Institute in March 2010 for criticizing the Republican rhetoric on the health care debate.

Here is a recent post authored by Frum published at his blog, FrumForum, entitled, Obama Wants Whitey’s Money.

Newt Gingrich upped the rhetoric against the president on Friday night. Interviewed by National Review’s Robert Costa, Gingrich cited Dinesh D’Souza’s cover story in Forbes.

Gingrich says that D’Souza has made a “stunning insight” into Obama’s behavior — the “most profound insight I have read in the last six years about Barack Obama.”

“What if [Obama] is so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin to piece together [his actions]?” Gingrich asks. “That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior.”

“This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president,” Gingrich tells us.

“I think he worked very hard at being a person who is normal, reasonable, moderate, bipartisan, transparent, accommodating — none of which was true,” Gingrich continues. “In the Alinksy tradition, he was being the person he needed to be in order to achieve the position he needed to achieve . . . He was authentically dishonest.”

With the Forbes story and now the Gingrich endorsement, the argument that Obama is an infiltrating alien, a deceiving foreigner – and not just any kind of alien, but specifically a Third World alien – has been absorbed almost to the very core of the Republican platform for November 2010.

Rush Limbaugh has been claiming for almost 2 years that President Obama is bent upon “redistribution” and “reparations.” Following D’Souza, Gingrich has now stepped up to suggest that this redistribution is motivated by anti-white racial revenge. If Obama wants to expand health coverage, tighten bank regulation, and create government make-work projects it’s not because he shares the same general outlook on the world as Walter Mondale or Ted Kennedy or so many other liberals, living and dead, all of them white and northern European. No, Obama wants to do what he does because he thinks like an African, and not just any kind of African but (in D’Souza’s phrase) “a Luo tribesman.”

It is to vindicate this African tribal dream that Obama wishes to raise the taxes of upper-income taxpayers and redistribute money away from these meritorious individuals. D’Souza contends that Obama is acting to vindicate his father’s supposed dream of overthrowing the global order and ending the global domination of the white race over other peoples.

* * *

Earlier this year, Gingrich deployed the phrase “secular socialist machine.” Adopting as his own D’Souza’s new epithet about “the ideology of the Luo tribesman” revs Gingrich’s attack into a higher gear. It would be very characteristic of Gingrich to road-test the new concept with friendly journalists and audiences. If they applaud, we’ll hear more of it.

* * *

As for the underlying D’Souza article that inspired Gingrich, what is there to be said? When last was there such a brazen outburst of race-baiting in the service of partisan politics at the national level? George Wallace took more care to sound race-neutral.

Though I wouldn’t venture to say that David Frum and I are birds of a feather, it is refreshing to see that conservatives with intellectual integrity aren’t extinct; just on the endangered species list.

About Post Author

C.H. McDermott

C.H. McDermott is a jack-nut doing what he loves best, which changes with each passing moment.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
13 years ago

Ah! But Newts don’t ‘mate for life’ like Magpies and such!…;-)

…oh dear…I am pissed you know…I’ve got the morning off…;-)

osori
13 years ago

Newt’s the George Foreman Grill of the Republican party. He reinvents himself to fit whichever mindset is currently on the rise.

A completely unprincipled dirtbag. Let’s not forget this is a scumbag who cheated on his sick wife.

13 years ago

Newts are an endangered species…be gentle with them – am I missing something here?…;-)

How can anyone with even half a brain be called ‘Newt’????

13 years ago

The Republicans have a strategy of Proxy Haters. Astro-Turf groups, Bircher wannabes, fringe outsiders like Newt and Cheney that won’t be running for office, and a News Network that has zero integrity willing to broadcast it all.

The closer it gets to November, the more mud slinging that’s going to occur. It’s going to get really ugly. You ain’t seen nothing yet

Jess
13 years ago

Newt’s trying to get the whackadoodle vote away from Bible Spice and former Governor magic underpants. this is their brightest. pshaw Frum and krauthamer dogging the Tundra twit this morning. I’m certain they’ll get some new talking points before tomorrow to bring them back in line.

SJ
13 years ago

here’s another interesting assessment from the Economist:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/09/obama_derangement_syndrome

SJ
13 years ago

Just when I thought I couldn’t be angry again.

Jess
Reply to  SJ
13 years ago

This one will make you so angry, you’ll want to find the nearest stupid person that votes pubbie, to just punch them. It is vile. Well I’ll let you guys be the judge, but it is truly disturbing what some of these people are doing and then saying, I think this might have gone a little too far. Be warned, it is truly vile, if you watch the video.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/09/14/tea-party-float-obama-whipping/

SJ
Reply to  Jess
13 years ago

You called it Jess. That put me into a fucking ball stompin’ rage. Luckily the Democratic Primaries were today, just voted. It was a good time out.

Jess
Reply to  SJ
13 years ago

But, but, none of them are racists or anything, according to them. I just read about an add to the tea party groups. They will be calling it Diversitea and get this, it’s because the PERCEPTION needs to be changed the tea party is racist. Now these other than white people will be part of Diversitea not the actual tea party itself. All about separate but equal the pubbies are. See if only they could change the perception we all have, that the tea party is a diverse group of people, it would be so much better. They make me sick. I’m going to join their group, see what kind of emails I get from them. That will make about 10 people there as of today.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/14/AR2010091405457.html
He said DiverseTea would highlight “African Americans, Jews, Hispanics, others that have come to this movement, because there is this nagging perception that we are not diverse.”

SJ
Reply to  Jess
13 years ago

As entertainer John Leguizamo said, Latinos for Republicans is like roaches for Raid.

SJ
Reply to  Jess
13 years ago

Jess, Thanks for the WaPo link.

Reply to  Jess
12 years ago

Normally I’m against killing but this article salhugtreed my ignorance.

Reply to  Jess
12 years ago

voZVDk isdusfqlahsp

Previous post Study: Men dirtier than women?
Next post You Have No Idea Have You?
17
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x