Critter talk: Does your dog drive? If so better check your local laws

Read Time:2 Minute, 16 Second

“Sometimes you just can’t legislate common sense,” is what some dog owners are saying in response to the driving safety legislation that’s been making its way through many states’ legislatures over the past couple of years. Some of these bills would specifically ban dogs from riding in the driver’s seat with their owners. Others mention pets specifically among a list of ticket-able “distractions.”

Dog owners who take their pets out for some fast-moving fresh air, and who happen to live in New Hampshire, Illinois, Arizona and Virginia, among other states, may find themselves investing in doggie seatbelts and canine safety seats — or risk getting a ticket. But is it fair? Will it help? Hmmmm …

In 2008, California’s Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed an outright ban on dogs in drivers’ seats, claiming there was insufficient time to handle this bill with so many more important items on the table. Dubbed “The Paris Hilton Bill” for this heiress’ penchant for parading her pooches while driving, it garnered nationwide attention for its triviality.

But there’s no denying it — dogs are a distraction. And many ride unsafely (for them, anyway). In fact, I believe that allowing dogs to hang out of windows, feet perched on the frame (a common sight in Miami) is as sanction-worthy as transporting loose dogs in the back of pick-ups. I’ve seen severe injuries from both versions — and more than one DOA.

But do I take my own advice?

At least one of my dogs rides with me every day. They’re expected to stay off my lap and sit in one spot while I drive. When I first pull out (if I’ve got two or more in tow) they jockey for the best seat before settling in. If Vincent’s especially fractious that day, the pin-‘im-to-the-seat restraining belt is always an option.

Funny that my biggest concern in these cases has never been my own driving. I’m always looking out for the dogs. I know that for their safety’s sake it’s best if my dogs are restrained. Not only would it keep them from becoming canine projectiles in the event of an accident, it would make it easier for rescue personnel to attend to all of us, should the unthinkable occur.

As much as we might dislike any legislation that would limit how we handle our dogs, perhaps some common sense rules would do us all some good. If nothing else, reading about these proposed laws has reminded me that my own pets could stand to suffer the indignity of buckling up more often. After all, I do every day. Why should they get treated to anything less?

Enhanced by Zemanta

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lazersedge
13 years ago

Rascal prefers to think that he has his own chauffeur (me) while he rides in his special back seat of his Bemr X3 (he such a snob at times). He has such a tough life.

thejeanmachine
13 years ago

I love my little dog but I don’t think I would let her drive.

Reply to  thejeanmachine
13 years ago

Not without lessons first.

Previous post Hold your breath – Men are watching
Next post Oral sex may cause cancer in men
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x