FBI Issues Child Porn Warning Over Video Barbie

Read Time:1 Second

Source: Newsy.com

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
13 years ago

My daughter might want one of these, so she can videotape the explosion…

“The best thing you can do with a Barbie is strap a rocket to her pink a**!”

Can you tell she is not into girly things?

The Lt.
13 years ago

There are a variety of reasons why I wouldn’t buy one of these for my daughter. One is that I am sure it would be given a bath within 24 hours thus destroying the camera, and two failing the bath it would become a dog toy for my two rotties and finally because it is just too damned expensive. By the way you have a great place here. A friend of mine told me about it. I’m in the Army stationed in Japan by the way so you have a far-reaching influence.

13 years ago

For a variety of reasons, it seems that a gift of a regular Barbie, along with a standard hidden camera, would likely be just as effective for pedophiles, so I don’t see a great risk there.

That said, I can see kids setting this up to “spy” on their parents (including their intimate moments), or to secretly record other kids and then post those videos online, which brings the Tyler Clementi case to mind–even if those videos aren’t sexual in nature, kids can be cruel, and there’s a lot of potential for this to be used as another mechanism for bullying. Either way, there is no way this is good for kids.

lazersedge
Reply to  Greenlight
13 years ago

I have to agree with you GL. This is less of a danger from pedophiles than it is of would be child CIA wanna be. I can see it now, mommy and daddy getting it on on the family Face Book page. Or, on the other hand, the girls who have been sexting their young boyfriends can now send them videos. Everyone first thinks of the innocent little girls when there isn’t a chance in hell that a pedophile would ever get the toy back from the kid (unless it was the daddy who was the dirty old man).

Reply to  lazersedge
13 years ago

Thanks, Lazer. That’s exactly what I was thinking–a family member would have access to rigging a camera on their own, hidden in a doll or not, and anyone outside of the family would have to run through the trouble of convincing the kid to have the recorder on and to return it to them afterward (or give it to a kid who didn’t realize it was a camera, and then somehow get it back) without the parents finding out. Still, there is ample potential for other kinds of mischief with this.

Thanks for the response. 🙂

Jess
13 years ago

Oh this is wrong on so many levels, for little kids.

13 years ago

Pedo-Barbie?!? Gross! That one mom has it right. Kids young enough to play with Barbie do not have any sense of appropriate boundaries. So who is this intended for?

Previous post Remember, remember the leaks of December
Next post Buy Immortality
7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x