EPA: We don’t need efficient emission control

Read Time:1 Minute, 14 Second

I think we should call this the “no balls” government. Every time we turn around the president or the other democrats are bowing to the wishes of the Radical Right, and in this case some on the Loony Left. Unbelievably, the EPA has decided, in the early stages of the world’s most threatening climate crisis, that pollution isn’t so bad after all. Read this depressing story from Newser:

Faced with stiff opposition in Congress and a court-ordered deadline, the EPA today said it will make it much cheaper for companies to reduce toxic air pollution from industrial boilers and incinerators. In an overhaul of air pollution regulations, the EPA said it found ways to control pollution at more than 200,000 industrial boilers, heaters, and incinerators nationwide at a 50% cost savings to the companies and institutions that run them.

Those operating large boilers that burn renewable fuels would not be required to install expensive technologies, and smaller boilers would require modest maintenance. That would cost $1.8 billion less each year than the original proposal. Republicans and some Democrats in Congress have criticized the EPA recently over the costs of regulations. “If this doesn’t satisfy the critics, I don’t think they will take yes for an answer. I don’t know how you can expect EPA to do any more than cut the cost of a rule in half,” said an attorney with Earthjustice, an advocacy group that sued the agency to draft new boiler regulations.

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.

professormike05@gmail.com