China Has Aircraft Carrier But No Planes

Read Time:3 Minute, 29 Second
In this May 2012 photo provided by China’s Xinhua News Agency, Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning cruises for a test on the sea. China formally entered its first aircraft carrier into service on Tuesday, underscoring its ambitions to be a leading Asian naval power. Li Tang/Xinhua/AP

In an effort to protect their national sovereignty China now has its first aircraft carrier called the Liaoning. This is cause for a great deal of patriotic celebration for the Communist Party in China but there is one small problem, they have no planes capable of landing or taking off from the carrier. But, they now have a carrier.

Officials said the carrier, a discarded vessel bought from Ukraine in 1998 and refurbished by China, would protect national sovereignty, an issue that has become a touchstone of the government’s dispute with Japan over ownership of islands in the East China Sea.
But despite the triumphant tone of the launch, which was watched by President Hu Jintao and Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, and despite rousing assessments by Chinese military experts about the importance of the carrier, the vessel will be used only for training and testing for the foreseeable future.

The mark “16” emblazoned on the carrier’s side indicates that it is limited to training, Chinese and other military experts said. China does not have planes capable of landing on the carrier and so far training for such landings has been carried out on land, they said.
Even so, the public appearance of the carrier at the northeastern port of Dalian was used as an occasion to stir patriotic feelings, which have run at fever pitch in the last 10 days over the dispute between China and Japan over the East China Sea islands, called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China.

The carrier will “raise the overall operational strength of the Chinese Navy” and help China “to effectively protect national sovereignty, security and development interests,” the Ministry of Defense said.

The Communist Party congress that will begin the country’s once-in-a-decade leadership transition is expected to be held next month, and the public unveiling of the carrier appeared to be part of an effort to forge national unity ahead of the event.
For international purposes, the public unveiling of the carrier seemed intended to signal to smaller nations in the South China Sea, including the Philippines, an American ally, that China has an increasing number of impressive assets to deploy.

American military planners have played down the significance of the commissioning of the carrier. Some Navy officials have even said they would encourage China to move ahead with building its own aircraft carrier and the ships to accompany it, because it would be a waste of money.

Other military experts outside China have agreed with that assessment.
“The fact is the aircraft carrier is useless for the Chinese Navy,” You Ji, a visiting senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore, said in an interview. “If it is used against America, it has no survivability. If it is used against China’s neighbors, it’s a sign of bullying.”

Vietnam, a neighbor with whom China has fought wars, operates land-based Russian Su-30 aircraft that could pose a threat to the aircraft carrier, Mr. You said. “In the South China Sea, if the carrier is damaged by the Vietnamese, it’s a huge loss of face,” he said. “It’s not worth it.”

Up to now, Chinese pilots have been limited to practicing simulated carrier landings on concrete strips on land in Chinese J-8 aircraft based on Soviet-made MiG-23s produced about 25 years ago, Mr. You said. The pilots could not undertake the difficult maneuver of landing on a moving carrier because China does not yet have suitable aircraft, Mr. You said.

Thanks to JANE PERLEZ and the the New York Times for information for the story.

Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.

If you liked our story please share it at REDDIT.COM and PINTEREST as well as TUMBLR.

About Post Author

Bill Formby

Bill Formby, aka William A. Formby, PhD, aka Lazersedge is a former Marine and a former police officer. He is a retired University Educator who considers himself a moderate pragmatic progressive liberal, meaning that he thinks practically liberal, acts practically liberal, and he is not going to change in the near future. But, if he does he will be sure to let you know.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JackSpratt
11 years ago

This is a tiny carrier, and not even close to what the U.S., or even Britain and France have in their arsenals. No doubt, however, the day will come, and sooner than later, when they will be rivaling us. I don’t trust China.

Bill Formby
Reply to  JackSpratt
11 years ago

I am sure they probably will at some point Jack but China is going to run into some of the same problems we have at some point. When they start diverting too much of their resources into defense they will then have trouble staying on top of the financial world. There are a lot of areas where the Chinese are still far behind the rest of the world in technology. This is mainly due to their tendency to copy everyone else and not invest in creativity.

Reply to  Bill Formby
11 years ago

You make a good point Bill, but sooner or later they’ll be copying us, and that will make for a problem. I’m with Jack. I don’t trust China either.

11 years ago

Now, that is just strange.
I guess it’s about “form” not “function” and that translates to a lot of wasted money for the sake of image.

Bill Formby
Reply to  Carol Maietta views
11 years ago

Absolutely.

Previous post Brown Staffers Insult Warren, Native Americans
Next post The Importance of Self Esteem
5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x