In light of the recent resignation of EPA Chief Lisa Jackson, the Beltway rumor mongers have been busy indeed, as insiders claim Jackson quit prematurely because she understood President Obama was going to OK the pipeline project, which has been widely condemned by responsible environmentalists.
Barack Obama has been just as zealous as George Bush in stripping away environmental, health and safety protection at the behest of industry, it turns out, says The Guardian.
Some environmental organizations were beginning to suspect this, after Obama over-ruled his scientific advisers and blocked stronger ozone standards.
Now, a new report from the Center for Progressive Reform has dug up some key data revealing that the White House in the age of Obama has been just as receptive to the pleadings of industry lobbyists as it was in the Bush era. And it goes far beyond ozone.
Under Obama, a little known corner of the White House – known as the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or Oira – has changed more than 80% of the rules proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and that has angered EPA boss Lisa Jackson.
According to the New York Post, EPA chief Lisa Jackson suddenly resigned last week because she was convinced that President Obama is planning to green-light the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline, The Post has learned.
“She was going to stay on until November or December,” said a Jackson insider. “But this changed it. She will not be the EPA head when Obama supports it [Keystone] getting built.”
While the State Department — not the Environmental Protection Agency — is responsible for the pipeline process because it’s an international project, Jackson is still the president’s top adviser on ecological policy.
She has expressed concerns over the proposed $7 billion pipeline that would carry Canadian oil sands through the US to refineries in the Gulf of Mexico.
Obama early this year rejected the Keystone project, but the pipeline’s operators have refiled their applications. And Jackson has told insiders that the president will approve the project this time — perhaps as soon as March or April.
Pipeline advocates charge it would be irresponsible to kill Keystone because it would create a windfall of jobs and economic activity.
Critics say the process of extracting oil from the tar sands produces excessive greenhouse-gas emissions.
Jackson’s spokeswoman, Victoria Rivas-Vazquez, referred back to the original announcement that she wanted to “pursue new challenges, time with her family and new opportunities.”
She said “the idea that her decision was made based on anything else is entirely false.”
The White House would not comment on Jackson’s rationale for resigning. Spokesman Clark Stevens said the “State Department’s assessment (of Keystone) is ongoing and any speculation would be premature.”
Now I don’t know what the president is thinking when he goes against the will of the majority, but no doubt, in this case at least, this is some sort of under the table compromise, much like the White House’s delisting of America’s wolves in order to garner the support of Montana’s Senator John Tester (D), and Idaho’s Representative Mike Stimpson (R) in a budget negotiation.
Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.
If you liked our story please share it at REDDIT.COM and PINTEREST as well as TUMBLR.

© 2013, ↑ MadMikesAmerica
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by HostGator - Designed by Gabfire Themes
James Smith
January 3, 2013 at 1:41 pm
Something I said before BHO was even elected the first time was, “He’s just another politician, subject to the same moneyed interests that have been running American presidents for a very long time.”
After he had been in office a couple of years I pointed out that he could be the hand-picked successor to “W”. What has he really changed? The economy was still in the toilet, we were (and are) in two counter-productive wars, the gulag at Guantanamo Bay is still operating, and the “Patriot” Act was not repealed but extended and strengthened.
The bank bail-out (nee robbery) was not canceled but went through as expected. (Obama did vote for it as a senator)
I also predicted that he would lose popularity because those that were for him would become angry when he could not or would not do what they expected and those against him would be angry no matter what he did or did not do.
If the Republicans had nominated anyone that was not a total loser, he would have been a one-term president. But the GOP didn’t seem to have anything but losers.
Joe Hagstrom
January 3, 2013 at 3:31 pm
I don’t think this is a real surprise. It sucks for the people who’s aquafir this thing is going through. On the other hand every leak means although the people will be thirsty or broke buying bottled water, they can use their wells for heating fuel.
James Smith
January 3, 2013 at 4:58 pm
So see there? It’s not all bad. In that area, they probably need more heating fuel. They can all drink beer.