Americans and Guns: Ignorance or Lack of Common Sense?

Read Time:7 Minute, 43 Second

There is probably little chance of congress actually developing any meaningful legislation regarding firearms or violence. The reasons are varied but most can be traced back to primary root causes.

There is the almighty dollar and it runs the engine of everything American. The gun makers and ammunition suppliers, while being quiet themselves, turn loose their hounds from hell in the form of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and a few other splinter groups who focus on being patriots protecting us from the evil government.

These groups use fear through false advertisements regarding crime in general, while at the same time preaching about the demons of  government taking away people’s rights. They also provide funding in large amounts to politicians, and then threaten them if they don’t support their position of “everyone should have a bunch of guns.” Although their support doesn’t seem to guarantee winning or losing, conservative, and a few liberal politicians jump when the NRA snaps its oily fingers.

This then leads to the next problem: the general public, which the mainstream media likes to call the “common people.” There is a total disconnect from rationality and logic when it comes to addressing the gun or violence problem [because of the traditional values] of Americans owning guns when meshed with fear tactic saturation. The tradition of having a gun, or several guns, in a citizen’s home for hunting and for protecting one’s ‘castle’ has long been a shotgun or a hunting type rifle along with perhaps a handgun or two. However, it is really hard for gun makers to make a lot of money unless they are enticing people to buy more guns by making different kinds.

They started to appeal to the militant factions, or perhaps to the military or bad guy wannabes. So now people who never had the courage or patriotism to actually join the military and serve their country could pretend they were actually military warriors.  But, they were just having fun. This was their hobby after all, and no one, even the government, should dare interfere with it.  As I pointed out, this became a disconnect between traditionally held values of America of a father and son going out and plunking cans with a .22 rifle or pistol or improving marksmanship or skeet shooting to practice bird hunting. Now  those “common people” are virtually foaming at the mouth because the government might dare put any limitations on the weapons they could possess.

They want a gun that has a flash suppressor, and a place to attach a bayonet, and a pistol grip possibly with a folding stock. Why, well hell, every body knows that if you shoot at a deer and miss he will see where the shot came from and come after you. Then you can attach your bayonet for some hand to antler combat, and, just in case more than one deer comes after you, you can flip down the stock to better use the rifle like a pistol, and quickly fire at the attacking deer. Yeah that’s Ted Nugent’s dream I suppose.

The issue here, is “a failure to communicate.”  Yes, the Second Amendment says citizen’s have the right to possess firearms. It does not say that citizen’s have the right to any firearm they wish to have, nor does it say that citizens can have them anywhere under any conditions.

By virtue of the fact that the government(s) have been allowed to take away this right from convicted felons, particularly the violent ones, indicates that Second Amendment rights are not absolute. Similarly, since the government has the right to limit or deny the possession or ownership of such things as machine guns, and anti tank weapons,  buttresses the argument that the Second Amendment is not absolute in its wording. The government does have the right to tell you, citizen, what firearms are permissible and which ones aren’t, and who can own one and who can’t.   To those who wish to echo Charlton Heston’s famous words, “from my cold dead hands” they will do that too. I have seen them do it, as did David Koresh and many others.

So the question then becomes, in terms of the “common people, ” what is bluster, ignorance or a lack of common sense? I would suggest that it is all of the above in some cases. As we have observed in the past, there is a large group of people in this country who simply listen to the right-wing talking points and never think for themselves. This would require they actually do some research and process it intellectually.  This requires too much brainpower for this group as they prefer the life of mushrooms; keep them in the dark and feed them bullshit.

Then there is the ‘just plain stupid’ group who puts their political and economic interests ahead of everything else.  They understand how dangerous the current situation is for the “common people,” especially those who are forced to live in less than desirable neighborhoods, but they just don’t give a damn. This is not only greedy stupidity, but a callous disregard of ordinary common sense. They have no desire to take steps toward controlling the problem, because it interferes with their agenda and who really cares if several thousand nobodies get killed off every year? They always get replaced after all, and those that get killed are usually from the wrong political party anyway.  Their ‘common sense’ point is to keep pushing the “everybody needs a few guns” theory.

If the gun pushers need a signal of how panicked these “common people” are they need only look so far as our schools and their “zero tolerance” policies toward kids. In an Associated Press article by Michael Rubinkam:

“Maryland father Stephen Grafton said common sense was in short supply in a case involving his 6-year-old son, who he said was suspended from White Marsh Elementary School in Trappe for using his hand as a “gun” during recess.”

Grafton, a staff sergeant in the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division, said administrators were criminalizing play. He said he told his son he shouldn’t shoot pretend guns because it makes some children upset, “but it was a difficult conversation to have because he didn’t do anything wrong.”

The school lifted the suspension after a day and removed it from his record, Grafton said.

“It’s a very hypersensitive time,” he said. “But, still, common sense has to apply for something like this, and it looks like common sense just went completely out the window.”

The school principal did not respond to messages.

Zero tolerance traces its philosophical roots to the “broken windows” theory of policing, which argues that if petty crime is held in check, more serious crime and disorder are prevented. So it’s no accident that students are often harshly punished over relatively minor misbehavior, said Russell Skiba, a zero tolerance expert at Indiana University’s Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.”

As a professor and consultant in the criminal justice field, I am quite familiar with the Broken Window Theory as proposed by James Q. Wilson and George Kelling. Unfortunately it has been bastardized far beyond the empirical status proposed by its authors.

It initially referred to a study in which neighborhoods that were allowed to deteriorate, tend to support a rise in criminal behavior. If, instead of allowing cars to waste away on the street, and empty homes become decrepit, the neighborhoods were well maintained and crime tended to stay away from those areas.

This follows a long-held belief by Wilson, which makes sense, that if the people in a neighborhood were paying attention to their areas, keeping it clean, neat, and etc., that typical criminal behavior including drug sales on the street, prostitution, and other petty crimes would not start, and by stopping these petty crimes major crimes would not begin. The problem was that many people took the petty crime issue and tried to translate it to everything, which doesn’t always apply.

According to Rubinkam’s article “We’ve seen literally thousands of these kinds of episodes of zero tolerance since the early 1990s……that concluded zero tolerance has not improved school security.”

Thus, failing to recognize the damage that gun violence is causing amounts to political and legal malpractice by the president and every legislative body in the country. When the issue is not only children being used as targets on the street and in the schools, but also being criminalized for menial acts of playing, it is time for people to take notice that common sense needs to be the phrase of the day. The political power and money grabbers need to be put in their place and told to shut up.  It’s time reasonable adults take over.  A lot of damage has been done psychologically to a lot of people in this country because people aren’t doing their job. It’s now time to start doing something. Granted something won’t fix everything, but it’s at least something.

Many thanks to the AP and others for their contributions to this article.

Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.

If you liked our story please share it at REDDIT.COM and PINTEREST as well as TUMBLR.

About Post Author

WAFormby

WAFormby has spent his life trying find out what he wants to be. When he determines that he will let everyone know, including himself. Most of his life he has been an educator and still enjoys bringing the light of knowledge, as he knows it, into the darkness of ignorance, as everyone else knows it. Despite his wealth of experience, education and knowledge he is humble and tries not to take himself too seriously.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 years ago

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: madmikesamerica.com/2013/02/americans-and-guns-ignorance-or-lack-of-common-sense/ […]

Lyndon Probus
11 years ago

Many decades will pass, and many more will die, before the Second Amendment is repealed, and that’s the only way to stop the continued proliferation of guns in America. Until that happens the so-called constitutionalists will forever wave it as a flag of protection and bow before its ambiguity. Very interesting analysis here Mr. Formby.

Reply to  Lyndon Probus
11 years ago

Lyndon, old friend, I suspect you’re right. Sadly.

Bill Formby
Reply to  Lyndon Probus
11 years ago

Thank you Mr. Probus. As I said, it is just time to try something because doing nothing doesn’t seem to be an option.

11 years ago

As I see it, there are plenty of laws restricting gun ownership. Felons, mentally ill, full-auto, explosive devices and ammunition are all regulated or prohibited. The problems are poor application of existing laws and laws that are unclear or contradictory.

A clear, simple, and applicable national standard would improve things a bit. Nothing would keep weapons out of the hands of criminals and anyone determined to flout the law.

Here in Brazil, it is very difficult for private citizens to own a firearm. I know of no private citizen that does. Long guns are sometimes on farms but are limited to shotguns or hunting rifles. Still, traficantes (drug dealers) and other criminals sometimes are better-armed than the police.

The national psychology of weapons as a means of solving all problems and “leveling the playing field” is a serious cause of gun violence. That mind set must be examined and treated to lower the incidence of violence as well as a more rational firearms policy.

People can be killed, even in large numbers, by someone with knives, swords, baseball bats, and even rocks. A cross bow is so deadly, at one time they were supposedly banned as being “too inhumane.” Yet, they are easily made by semi-skilled labor. A strong slingshot can propel a ball-bearing hard enough to kill, and blowguns can also be deadly.

Certainly, let’s form a rational, enforceable firearms policy. But let’s not neglect the “kill first” pathology that causes people to turn to murder as the first and only solution to their anger.

Reply to  James Smith
11 years ago

Anyone looking for information or proof of the deadliness of cross bows need only to watch an episode of The Walking Dead. You make some good points James.

Reply to  Professor Mike
11 years ago

I am speaking from personal experience. I had a home-made crossbow that would drive a bolt through a target of 2X4s from about 30 yards.

I also had a home-made blowgun that would penetrate a 1/4″ plywood target from over 50′. Maybe if I had been more skilled in making and using them, they might have done even better?

Reply to  James Smith
11 years ago

I’ve never used one but have always been fascinated by their power.

Bill Formby
Reply to  James Smith
11 years ago

Hey, James there might be a market for them here. Call them your “Silent Killer”. At least people can’t kill 20 people at a time with them.

Reply to  Bill Formby
11 years ago

If they get them to line up they can get several at one time, though. 😉

You can’t kill 20 at one time with a gin, either, even an automatic weapon. Very quickly, true, but it takes an explosive device for that. Those can easily be home made, too.

Again, the real problem is a tendency to use violence to resolve conflicts or release anger and frustration.

Bill Formby
Reply to  James Smith
11 years ago

What you say is true James. All good points. However, the current set of laws, and I emphasize the plural here, has so many holes in it it is like a sieve. I agree that there needs to be a coherent national policy that is enforced rigorously and fully. There needs to be a common sense foundation to it. And you are right. I have long argued here and elsewhere that something needs to change in the American culture where conflict resolution is concerned. America, because of its youth as a country has little of a culture it can call its own. Sadly, the tendency for its people to resort to violence so quickly as a way to settle conflicts is prominent in its culture. And we are now pushing kids so hard in the other direction with this zero tolerance B.S. that they rebel the other way when they get older.

Reply to  Bill Formby
11 years ago

Outstanding, Bill. I especially liked your last point. Somehow, we think that kids are so stupid they cannot see how ludicrous our “zero good sense” policy and Young people have always had a tendency to rebel and providing them with a stupid example will not change that.

Bill Formby
Reply to  James Smith
11 years ago

James, I know I did and suspect you also play cops and robbers or cowboys and indians when we were kids. When I was in shop in junior high school I was allowed to make a wooden gun. I don’t ever remember having a thought about killing a bunch of people.
One thing I do believe is that there seems to be a problem with many people born after 1955. They seem to be the ones that have less invested in this country and began the trend of feeling entitled to everything and the later they were born the worse they got.

Reply to  Bill Formby
11 years ago

Maybe it was because we were playing those things that we got the nonsense out of our systems. If a kid wanted to do that now, they would rush him to a shrink. Yet, it seems OK if they play violent video games for hours with no interaction with other people.

Yes, something is very wrong and I’m not sure what is causing it, but I think we’d better find out and soon.

AnonymousNot
11 years ago

Politics and common sense equal a contradiction in terms I fear. Good read. Passionate.

Bill Formby
Reply to  AnonymousNot
11 years ago

That they are Anon Not.

Previous post Next to Oscar Pistorius Tiger Woods doesn’t look so bad
Next post N. Korea Video Shows Obama, Troops Burning
16
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x