I expect that Sea Shepherd’s on ocean actions may be backed by US, Japanese and international advocacy, but I never hear about those efforts. Much as with the “tree spikers” and heavy equipment saboteurs, Sea Shepherd needs several other organizations to REALLY take over the advocacy efforts, because you can’t lobby effectively if you are also engaged in activities that are tolerated on the one hand but decidedly illegal on the other.
This is a dilemma…the heart of the dilemma. Similarly, Greenpeace has not been very effective in the halls of Congress, but Sierra Club has taken up that job and they have created a symbiotic team (not always in agreement) that gets many good jobs done. Radicals cannot lobby effectively, and lobbyists can’t effectively create the kinds of real world pressures radicals can. Sea Shepherd needs help from one or several “Sierra Clubs” AND we need to hear about those efforts just as much as we hear about the adventures at sea.
Meanwhile, make no mistake, laying prop-fouling lines and interfering with fueling on the high seas could easily lead to one or more of their ships being sunken. They are engaged in a form of piracy that would, under any other circumstances, lead to brutally tough sanctions and jail time.
I sense the Japanese are unwilling to launch the kinds of defensive efforts that would be justified under other circumstances, because the whole world is watching. But they are very close to all out combat. The Japanese crews use grappling hooks and harpoons to attack Sea Shepherd volunteers–especially when they are on the “Zodiacs” near the Japanese fleet. There are many times volunteers end up overboard in Antarctic waters.
Sea Shepherd’s fleet is inferior to that of the Japanese whaling fleet. They are slower, smaller and less maneuverable. The harpoon ships can prevent Sea Shepherd vessels from approaching the “mother ship” simply by outflanking the Bob Barker and other vessels. With so much at stake, however, I expect the Japanese will escalate the violence if Sea Shepherd is able to do more than harass the Japanese fleet.
Clearly the reported government warnings are serious. Both entities are engaged in highly illegal behaviors. The Japanese have the advantage, however, of government relations. Governments can take on the Japanese government or they can turn their backs if there is a deadly incident at sea. The Japanese walk the fine line only because Sea Shepherd is both unwilling and unable to “ram” other vessels or launch crippling attacks on the Japanese fleet. The Japanese are outwitting and out-spending Sea Shepherd to avoid a deadly incident that might bring sanctions against them…and genuine enforcement by military ships of other nations.
Sea Shepherd has the world’s attention focused on this struggle, but they need one or more powerful allies to take up the cause where it really counts…in halls of governments that can force the Japanese to stop.
Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.
If you liked our story please share it at REDDIT.COM and PINTEREST as well as TUMBLR.
Visitors have not browsed from this post. Become the first by clicking one of our related posts
© 2013, ↑ MadMikesAmerica
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by HostGator - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Lyndon Probus
February 27, 2013 at 12:29 pm
What an extraordinary analysis Mr. Moore, and I happen to agree with you. As I understand it the Sea Shepherd organization doesn’t play well with others, and powerful organizations such as Greenpeace, a shadow of its former self, and the Sierra Club, are disapproving of the group’s anti-whaling activities and are afraid of being painted with the same broad brush. The same applies for the various nations that eschew whaling and are highly critical of the Japanese. Failing such allies I can only encourage these brave men and women to keep on keeping on, mindful all the while, of the great risks they take on behalf of these intelligent, magnificent creatures.
Michael John Scott
February 27, 2013 at 2:48 pm
Well said Lyndon. I’m hoping Jim weighs in on your comment.
Mark Willis
February 27, 2013 at 6:28 pm
This is a passionate, yet considered read. I congratulate the author for his careful examination of the current situation involving dedicated conservationists and a scofflaw government.
Timmy Taylor
February 27, 2013 at 7:35 pm
The Japanese are quite capable of most horrendous acts, as evidenced by their treatment of POW’s and native populations during WWII. I wouldn’t want to go up against those monsters.