
Fresh shark fins dry on the deck of an apprehended fishing boat in a declared shark and manta ray sanctuary located in the eastern region of Indonesia.
Conservation International//Getty Images
Sharks are particularly vulnerable, National Geographic says, “because they take long periods to mature and generally produce few young over their lifetimes.”
“There’s a staggering number of sharks being caught every year and the number is way too high considering the biology of species,” the study’s lead researcher tells National Geographic.
Shark killings must decline “drastically in order to rebuild depleted populations and restore marine ecosystems with functional top predators,” the study says.
Published in the journal Marine Policy, the report precedes Sunday’s Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. Officials will consider protections for the most threatened shark species, the BBC reports.
Though the body rejected similar proposals in 2010, the BBC says, advocates believe they have wider support this time and expect to get the measures passed.
Meanwhile, new protections for great white sharks took effect Friday in California, Reuters reports. The sharks are now candidates for making the state’s endangered species list.
Great whites are already shielded from commercial and sport fishing, Reuters says, but new provisions target the unintentional snaring that can happen during gill-net fishing.
Story by Dana Farrington writing for NPR.
Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.
If you liked our story please share it at REDDIT.COM and PINTEREST as well as TUMBLR.

James Smith
March 2, 2013 at 5:08 pm
You are correct here, but as long as there is a market, people will try to fell it and only care about cash, not ecology. Look at how many species have been exterminated. That passenger pigeon, one seen in the millions was eradicated for sport.
The American bison was nearly eradicated for the same reason. People would shoot them from trains and allow the carcasses to rot where they fell. Professional hunters would kill them only for the tongues, leaving the rest where they lay. Those are only two examples well within the last 200 years.
Michael John Scott
March 2, 2013 at 7:08 pm
What makes it worse is the shark finners invariably throw the shark back in the water after cutting off its fins, so an accurate body count is impossible and quotas are impossible to enforce.