Don’t Blame Islam for Boston Marathon Bombing

Read Time:3 Minute, 59 Second

What happened in Boston?  Two young guys, brothers with family ties to Chechnya, planted two bombs at the Boston Marathon finish line, killed several, and wounding scores of others.  Two days later they killed a police officer, and terrorized the Boston suburbs before one was killed and the other was captured.  Word has it they were adherents of Islam and, as it turned out, terrorists.  Does that make them Islamic terrorists?

muslims
Muslims attending prayer service. Picture courtesy of triblocal.com.

Marc Ambinder of The Week has some opinions:

We are still speculating about virtually everything right now, but I feel as though I need to explain why I find the quick and easy conversation about Muslims being radicalized in America to be so illogical and laced with bigotry.

Of course, there is a global violent jihadist movement, loosely organized, that wants to recruit young men to influence policies at home and abroad and perhaps usher in the global caliphate. That ideology motivates some Muslims to kill innocent people.

But you’re allowed to be a radical Muslim in America. You’re allowed to believe that the Qu’ran proscribes the most elegant set of laws. You’re allowed to believe that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. And you can say, in America, pretty much anything you want. Not everything, and after 9/11, a little less, but you can still make very unpopular arguments.

So just for the sake of argument, let’s assume that the only factor that motivated these two brothers from Chechnya to set off bombs and kill police officers is their decision to accept some form of radical Islamic teachings as their foundational belief system. (I highly doubt this is the case, but let’s just throw it out there.)

We ask: “We have to look at the whole issue of radicalization. What prompts someone raised as an American to cause such carnage?”

That’s what Peter King, the Republican chair of the Homeland Security committee, asked. So he goes right to the religion; somehow, he slides very quickly past the possibility that something about America is radicalizing people of all sorts.

He commits the sin of essentialism.

It’s a horrible habit: A Korean-American shoots fellow students at Virginia Tech, and suddenly, we’re forced to pretend that it’s OK to blame Korean-American family structure and culture for putting him over the edge, ignoring the millions of Korean-Americans who have never considered taking up arms.

The murderer Andrew Cunanan was, in Tom Brokaw’s famous words, a “homicidal homosexual.”

See? The gay made him do it.

But when a white kid murders dozens of children, we don’t ask whether the predominant Christian religion in America somehow radicalized him, or whether his upbringing was somehow less American than anyone else’s. Stupid questions! Glad we don’t ask them.

It is far more plausible that American gun culture, the way that Americans are uncomfortable with people who are different, the gaps in the mental heath system, and a hundred other things, some of which cannot ever be controlled, pushed these two men over the edge. If it was Islam, or a hidden network of radical jihadists, then these types of events would not be rare in America. That they are is the answer to whether Islamic radicalization is a problem that Americans can and must contend with by stigmatizing Muslims.

What is it about America that so alienates young men?

What is it about their community — Cambridge, lower-middle class, American popular culture — that isolated them and encouraged their pursuit of a different way to add meaning to their lives?

Here’s the thing: We won’t really ever know. We rightfully seek closure and answers, but we ought to come to grips with the reality that violence against random others is often a conspiracy of the mind.

I love American culture, and I also think that something about living in a modern society loosens the moorings that prevent us from acting on our deepest, ugliest thoughts. Maybe in America it’s a combination of economic distress, mass media, access to guns, bias and prejudice; maybe elsewhere it’s the decline of ordering institutions like the church.

The two suspects were Cantabrigians before they were Chechens. They were Americans before they Chechens. They were Americans; one was apparently a Muslim who had found a lovely girlfriend and never seemed to find that his religion was incompatible with whatever “normal” America is supposed to be.

Bias against Muslims is real and it hurts. And the easiest way to radicalize un-radicalized people is to treat them like enemies.

Many thanks to Marc Ambinder of The Week for this article.

Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.

About Post Author

Guest Contributor

Guest contributors are those who provide commentary, advice, or other food for thought designed to entertain and enlighten our readers.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
11 years ago

It’s Islam. Not all muslims are terrorists but too many are. Sorry. It’s Islam. If the two brothers weren’t followers it wouldn’t have happened.

Such is life lately.

I have muslim friends by the way – a couple are, for want of a better description, serious muslims – ie they attend mosques and prayers and all that mallarky.

They are telling me ‘It IS Islam’ and are saying ‘Islam is being hijacked by fundamentalists’

When I ask them why they don’t speak out against the fundamentalists they say ‘We are afraid to’.

Sorry pal. It’s Islam. Not your Islam but the Islam that is increasingly coming to dominate your faith.

If that hurts you then claim it back and shout from the roof tops that Islam is yours not theirs.

If you don’t it’s theirs.

It isn’t for us ‘non-muslims’ to be nice – it’s for you decent muslims to reclaim YOUR faith.

The work, my friend, is ALL yours.

Good luck x

Reply to  Norman Rampart
11 years ago

Norman, you are unabashedly “politically incorrect.” That’s one of the things I like about you. Call ’em like they are.

I think you could say the same thing about Christianity. It is being hijacked by the Pat Robertson/Glenn Beck/Bill O’Reilly crowd.

Moderate Muslims? Moderate Christians? Where are they? Why are they not speaking out three ways, loudly, frequently, and clearly?

Yes, I concede there are a few who do, but they are very few. I suspect the rest, on some level, agree with the fundamentalists.

Not to condemn is to condone.

Reply to  James Smith
11 years ago

It slightly worries me James, old bean, that WE are the moderates in so many ways…oh dear..the World is dependent on athiests 😉

Oh WTF??? Let’s just enjoy life while we have it eh? Well, it certainly beats an explosive belt around the belly eh? Bloody big belt in my case…;-)

11 years ago

Phyco babble…

Bill Formby
11 years ago

Actually, we don’t know what will be determined to be the cause of the actions of these two men. However, in contrast to the author’s contention I have long held the theory that most serial killers are the result of early sexual repression of young males, often by dominant females, in the name of the Christian or protestant religions, or at least their interpretations of it. I also feel that this leads to serial rapists and most domestic violence. The vast majority of Christian religions repress sexual tendencies in young males and make it seem to be something dirty and ugly. Children are also made to feel powerless with no control over themselves or their thoughts and that God will view them in a negative way if they have impure thoughts. This becomes an intense struggle through the adolescent years into early adulthood. As they mature, young males in particular, begin to emerge from that control without structure for their new roles as adults. In cases where the child was repressed sexually women become the targets of revenge. In cases where the child was physically abused they behave as they believe they are supposed to behave by becoming abusers. The only thing a sexually repressed child needs is a trigger to remind him of his deprivation to set him off as a serial offender.

11 years ago

Now that we have the remaining person in custody, it is possible we may learn some facts.

More likely is we will hear only what his lawyers want him to say.

Previous post DirectTV: A Tale of Error 775
Next post If you want to lose weight just stop eating
6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x