Senator Lies About Wolf Sightings To Strip Them of Federal Protection

Read Time:1 Minute, 48 Second

A Michigan senator, desperate to strip wolves of endangered species protection, lied about wolf sightings.

Sen. Tom Casperson, R-Escanaba, apologized Thursday for putting false information about the sighting of wolves outside a day care center in his resolution urging Congress to strip gray wolves of endangered species protections.  He acknowledged the story he told was pure fiction.

“I was mistaken, I am accountable, and I am sorry,” Casperson said. “Words matter. Accuracy matters. Especially here, with a topic that is so emotional and is so important to so many, especially those whose way of life is being changed in my district.”

According to MLive.com, an Ironwood woman said she saw one wolf on her lawn in 2010 while she was caring for children inside. Lori Holm said she screamed and it fled.

The resolution reported a different scenario.

“Wolves appeared multiple times in the backyard of a daycare center shortly after the children were allowed outside to play,” it said. “Federal agents disposed of three wolves in that backyard because of the potential danger to children.”

No children were in the backyard that day, and three wolves were shot seven months later less than a mile away, MLive.com said.

Casperson said there remains a sound basis for hunting wolves.-

“Contrary to those that oppose the hunt, wolves can and will attack humans,” he said, citing an attack on a teenage camper in Minnesota this year.

“A decision here of whether or not we use sound science to manage wolves, as with all decisions this body makes, should not be based on emotions, agendas or innuendo, but rather on facts,” he said.

Casperson said he still supports the thrust of the 2011 resolution sent to Congress, despite the factual errors it contained.

“Years ago, when I worked for my family’s trucking company, we didn’t scrap a log truck because it had a flat tire,” Casperson said. “We fixed the tire and kept trucking. For the same reason, I will not disown the whole resolution about wolves because of an error in the text. I will correct the error and continue to promote safety in our communities.”

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 years ago

[…] Read the story here. Then, let’s continue the conversation about wolves and wildlife started on Good Nature on November 5, with a companion piece on November 12. […]

nathan
10 years ago

As Mahoney said this is all about greed and has nothing to do with protecting the animals. It’s little more than a continuation of America’s fixation with guns, and all things that go bang. It’s also about the macho American male with chest puffed up, rifle at the ready, posing beside his prey: the grey wolf. Assholes every one of them.

Timmy Mahoney
10 years ago

I live in Michigan, and killing wolves is all the talk and all the sport. The bills in the legislature have been sponsored by the republican toadies of the various hunting organizations. All they want to do is sell licenses to people so they can hire guides to show them where to kill wolves. It’s a sham and a scam. Better keep Obama out of it though or he’ll make sure they lose their protection like he did in some Northwestern states so he could make a budget deal with senators from wolf killing states.

Linh
10 years ago

Oddly enough, my only reaction to this is “Stop being so stereotypical, Republican Senator!” I actually hoped it wouldn’t be a Republican when I read the headline, just to break the stereotype.

I love the constant references to it being an “error” rather than a “lie.” It’s in the same vein as the euphemisms that British politicians have to use because of the existence of “unparliamentary language.”

Marsha Woerner
10 years ago

I have a totally different interpretation of that “flat tire” story. I agree that a whole law or bill should not be scrapped because of one problem. BUT
In that vein, one human being killed by a wolf does NOT justify totally scrapping the protection that we Americans have felt that wolves deserve. Particularly not knowing any details of the one human killed… I know that livestock is a problem. But is the problem to be solved by no longer protecting an important species to our environment? I’m tired of the American way of saying “there’s exactly ONE answer, and it’s the one that we come up with in the easiest possible manner!”

Bill Formby
10 years ago

Maybe there should shoot him. Mike, I may be totally wrong about this but I don’t remember the last time I read, or even heard, of a person being killed by a wolf anywhere in the country. I know they do kill livestock but I can’t recall a person being killed by one.

Rachael
10 years ago

At least he admitted he lied. Unusual for a republican.

Previous post Money Talks
Next post Comfy and Cozy: 8 Seating Solutions for Your Living Room
12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x