Senate Decides Global Warming Exists But You Won’t Believe What Inhofe Said

Read Time:4 Minute, 27 Second

There are a lot of people, mostly Republicans, and super-religious, that are confused about the climate change phenomenon, and, apparently, so is the U.S. Senate, but that’s nothing new. Yesterday’s vote on whether it even exists, however, comes as a surprise along with the startling result.

GwdRepublicanScience

Once adamant climate change/global warming deniers are now changing their tunes.  Even James Inhofe, ironically the chairman of the Environment/Public Works committee, admits the climate is changing, but won’t go so far as to say humans are causing it, preferring to blame it on Jesus instead.

From Slate:

In a series of nonbinding (but potentially embarrassing) votes on Wednesday, the Senate has decided overwhelmingly that global warming exists. Minutes later, in a second vote, senators failed to agree on a root cause.

According to the Hill, the Senate first voted 98-1 in favor of a nonbinding amendment that said “climate change is real and not a hoax.” Republicans read the text of that amendment in such a way as to absolve themselves of taking a stand on the human component of global warming. (Republican Sen. Roger Wicker, of Mississippi, was the lone holdout.) The second vote on an amendment by Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz, of Hawaii, wasn’t so clear-cut. That amendment read, in part: “It is the sense of Congress that 1) climate change is real, and 2) human activity significantly contributes to climate change.” Though the vote on the second amendment was 50-49 in favor, it needed 60 votes to pass.

The first amendment was intended to take a swipe at Sen. James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, and the new chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee. He’s also a leading Senate climate denier who’s so sure climate change is a massive conspiracy by the world’s scientists, he wrote a book about it. In a surprise, he actually voted for Wednesday’s amendment, “but he made clear he doesn’t believe humans are the primary driver of climate change” said the Hill. Instead, he used the Bible to support his vote:

“Climate is changing, and climate has always changed, and always will, there’s archeological evidence of that, there’s biblical evidence of that, there’s historic evidence of that, it will always change,” Inhofe said on the Senate floor. “The hoax is that there are some people that are so arrogant to think that they are so powerful that they can change climate. Man can’t change climate.”

The debate over S.1 is the first about energy on the Senate floor in eight years, according to the New York Times. Obama is expected to veto the bill, but that didn’t stop the Republican-controlled Congress from taking a stand. “Part of the Democrats’ strategy is to put Republicans on the record about an issue that’s controversial inside the GOP but is much less so with the public and Democratic Party,” says the Wall Street Journal.

Mashable’s Andrew Freedman notes that this isn’t the first time the Senate has attempted to legislate the existence of climate change. In 2005, the Senate approved a nonbinding amendment similar to the second amendment. That the Senate wasn’t able to do the same on Wednesday is telling of how increasingly political the question of human-caused climate change has become in the last decade.

Yet, since 2005, evidence has continued to mount that climate change is driven by human activity. As Obama noted during Tuesday’s State of the Union, 14 of the last 15 years have been the hottest on record globally. More greenhouse gases were emitted into the atmosphere in 2014 than in any other year in human history. In his speech, Obama said “no challenge poses a greater threat to future generations.”

Because the votes are nonbinding, there are no real implications beyond the political. But with the 2016 presidential campaign just around the corner, Democrats figure this is a perfect time to put potential Republican contenders on the record. Among them, Florida’s Republican Sen. Marco Rubio stands out. Rubio, who isn’t quite sure how old the Earth is, was recently installed as chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries and Coast Guard, where he directly oversees the budget of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, America’s leading scientific agency on climate. Oh, he’s also polling among the top three Republican contenders for president in 2016.

Inhofe, Rubio, and Ted Cruz, of Texas—another Republican presidential contender—all voted against the second amendment on the cause of climate change. According to National Journal, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, Mark Kirk of Illinois, Susan Collins of Maine, and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina were the only Republicans to vote against party lines on the amendment endorsing humans as the primary cause of climate change.

The vote comes after Obama mocked Republicans during his State of the Union speech for using the “I’m not a scientist” defense to justify continued knuckle-dragging on climate change. “The Pentagon says that climate change poses immediate risks to our national security. We should act like it,” he said.

The Senate is expected to take up the issue again on Thursday, including votes on at least one more amendment regarding the cause of climate change.

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
9 years ago

Bloody freezin’ over here….

Joe Hagstrom
9 years ago

As about the only right thinking Christian around here I believe I have the final say in this matter.
Why does this nut Inhofe blaming Jesus for climate change and the dangerous weather which comes from it like that which devastated New Jersey and New Orleans. We all know it was the work of the Devil
My side has now abandoned God. For shame.

Marsha Woerner
9 years ago

Oh, and Imhoff is an a**. How DO people get selected for committees, and the chairs thereof? It’s clearly NOT based on knowledge, background, or abilities!

Marsha Woerner
9 years ago

Had the Senate nothing more important to do than voting on whether or not something is true? This “Bill” is ludicrous! Is there any action associated with it, at all, whatever? I suppose that if the “Bill” passes (??), then some people can say “you see, we really should do something about it. After all, we passed a bill that says it’s true!” but I think that it is more important that the effort – and money – be put into actions, not decisions as to whether or not something is true! I’m sorry, this whole situation is just stupid and a waste of money!

9 years ago

So let me get this straight. Besides the fact that these morons are bent on denying proven science – or swaddling it in Biblical pap – there’s the fact that we’re paying these asshats to sit around and pontificate on the subject?

They’re actually holding a vote on the existence and the root causes of global climate change?

Here’s what I don’t get. What exactly is Congress’s job? I mean what do they do, to earn those huge paychecks? Suppose they do vote that climate change exists. And suppose that they say, what the hell, and vote that it’s caused by Human pollution. Then what?

“We have agreed to determine that the moon is round. A committee has been formed to decide what to do about that. We’ll get back to you on it.”

I’m done. I used to think that all politicians were corrupt liars and thieves. Now, I realize that it’s just the career you choose when you get tired of working for a living.

9 years ago

What difference does it make what the senate votes or says? Nothing will change.

The Indiana state legislature once voted to round off the mathematical value Pi to an even three. Did rational people stop multiplying the radius of a circle by 3.1415926+ to obtain the circumference?

Nothing the senate decides about global warming can change anything. “Beliefs, no matter how sincerely held, do not alter facts.” Politicians, along with the religious, cannot seem to understand that.

Previous post DOJ: Evidence Michael Brown Tried to Disarm Wilson-No Charges Forthcoming
Next post American Family Crazies: Obama’s Muslim Faith Buried in SOTU Code
10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x