Solving Britain’s Immigration Problem While Leaving Lots of Room for Rabbits

I’ve been thinking – and I know – that is often something of a worry but I can’t help it. Really I can’t. I try not to as I know it can often cause offence and difficulties but it’s something that I do whether I like it – or indeed, whether you like it – or not. It just sort of happens when I wake up.

There’s not a great deal I can do about it really, apart from not waking up of course, but then I’d be dead and, frankly, as I’ve decided that I am immortal that just ain’t gonna happen. So, I will just have to put up with me thinking.

My latest thought processes have been about the problem of immigration. The immigration in question is, not entirely surprisingly as I’m English, related to immigration in England and, as I’m also British, immigration into Britain.

The general theory behind what passes for my thought processes however can, I believe, relate to pretty much any country.

It isn’t that immigration itself is a problem – well, it probably is to the ‘far right racist’ types – but it is a problem when it isn’t controlled. Immigration can be, and often is, a boon to any country. Mass immigration is and will always be a disaster for any country.

Britain – and for my particular reasoning England – has long suffered the problems of ‘mass’ immigration. The last Labour Government of Blair literally ‘opened our borders’ to any and every ‘Tom, Dick and Harry’ to increase their voter base. That isn’t my opinion incidentally, it’s one of many ‘confessions’ by Peter Mandelson, a former Blair ally.

Blair’s Labour government actually searched the globe and invited generally unskilled immigrants over as, statistically, immigrants of that type would, generally, vote for Labour as Labour had ‘let them in’. That was Labour’s logic at the time anyway and the result was a catastrophic change in the demographics of certain parts of England.

The problem is that when you open your borders to all you can’t ‘plan your infrastructure’ therefore your infrastructure will struggle to cope and, ultimately, may even collapse altogether.

Britain’s continued membership of the European Union merely exacerbates the problem as our membership must include an ‘open border’ policy that allows any citizen of the EU into Britain.

Again it is impossible to ‘plan’ our infrastructure if we have no idea how many people are coming here to live.

I’m not aware that anything I have said yet could be construed as racist nor wrong. If anyone reading this thinks anything I have said is wrong I would dearly love to know which planet you are from and how you manage to remain outside of a lunatic asylum.

All countries are finite in terms of area. The ‘area’ or space that a country has is decided geographically and cannot be changed unless a natural disaster reduces or even increases the size of said country.

The infrastructure of any country is there to ensure that the people living there have, in the case of Britain, sufficient housing, free health care, sufficient jobs and other things such as public transport and so forth.

In order to ensure that the above is achievable and maintainable it is essential that the country knows A) The current population and B) the likely increase in population.

A census tells them the current population and history tells them, with a reasonable degree of accuracy based on birth rates and controlled immigration, the likely population over a certain number of years.

That enables the country to plan their infrastructure accordingly and, whilst total accuracy is impossible, ensure that the people living there can get the jobs and the health care etc etc that they need.

Membership of the EU means we can never ‘plan’ for ‘numbers’ therefore we can never ‘plan’ our infrastructure even vaguely correctly which will always result in people somewhere suffering from a lack of housing or health care etc.

Our current government have tried to control immigration from outside the EU with limited success – this is puzzling really as all we have to do is turn people away at our borders. ‘No you can’t come in’ isn’t so hard to say is it? Apparently it can be for some unfathomable reason.

I have always made it perfectly clear that I would relish Britain leaving the EU and a couple of commenter’s have told me I am mad to even contemplate such a thing – albeit they have failed abysmally to actually explain why leaving would be mad. Actually they couldn’t. They could say ‘it will destroy British business’ or something but, frankly, nobody knows for sure what would happen.

It’s a ‘belief’ and that’s all it is. I believe we should leave the EU and some believe otherwise. Unless or until we do nobody really knows what the consequences would be.

One consequence would be that we would regain control of our borders and we could turn away any we didn’t want to enter. That has to be a good thing for any country.

In the meantime we could send everyone back to Pakistan and India and Poland and Africa. Then we could send all the Scots back to Scotland and Welsh back to Wales and Irish back to Ireland.

After that we could send all those of Viking ancestry back to Scandinavia and all those of French or Germanic ancestry back to France and Germany.

Basically we can send anyone who isn’t really English based on their ancestry back to wherever their ancestors came from.

Then we would have a true England full of true English people and – oh – er – then there wouldn’t be anybody here including me most likely. Still, there’d be lots of room for rabbits and things.

Part of this post is serious and genuine and part of it isn’t – just in case you hadn’t noticed.

There’s nowt wrong with immigrants or immigration. There’s an awful lot wrong with immigrants who want to change us and not adapt to us and mass immigration.

That’s all I’m saying and I’m right.

If you think I’m wrong you are nuts.

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %