How Demented Donald Arrived At His Nonsensical Wiretap Allegations

Read Time:1 Minute, 46 Second
Crazy Donald speaks in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

by Michael John Scott

So where did Trump’s insane bombshell accusation that his predecessor tapped his phones originate? The White House, not known for telling the truth, tells the Fact Checker blog at the Washington Post that Trump’s relying on reports “from BBC, Heat Street, New York Times, Fox News, among others.”

After a thorough analysis, the Post finds that the two most important ones are from the right-leaning Heat Street and the BBC. Other reports have cited an article at Breitbart News, but it relies on the Heat Street piece its content.

The two articles say that US intelligence officials went to the FISA court which deals with intelligence matters because they wanted to investigate possible activity between two banks in Russia and a computer server in Trump Tower which, to make matters more confusing, might actually be located in Philadelphia. Here are some excerpts:

  • Heat Street: “Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.”
  • BBC: It says Justice Department lawyers went to the FISA court. “Their first application, in June, was rejected outright by the judge. They returned with a more narrowly drawn order in July and were rejected again. Finally, before a new judge, the order was granted, on 15 October, three weeks before election day.”

Even if the stories are accurate, and that hasn’t been confirmed, the fact checkers do not say that President Obama was behind the request. Plus, they involve a computer server, not the tapping of phone lines. Finally, they “do not back up the administration’s revised claim of politically motivated investigations.” As a result, Trump gets the blog’s worst rating of Four Pinocchios.

Click to read the full piece, which analyzes all the articles in question.

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Britta von Kannen
7 years ago

The whole story is based on a very weak construction, hearsay and speculation, nothing more than a flimsy house of cards. 2 British sources who can’t produce any evidence for their claims. Pathetic! Sad, very sad.

Previous post Politicos Respond to Trump Wiretapping Claims
Next post Ten Little Russian Spies Went Out To Dine-Another With Ties To Trump Dies
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x