The Appearance of Stupidity
by Glenn R. Geist
Three times in a 30 second conversation on MSNBC: talking heads have picked up the business school babble and have replaced “appearances” with “Optics.” Forcing “optics” into every other sentence has become truly obsessive.
Listen up here. I have directed my Generals to come up with a plan to get rid of this within 30 days. It’s going to be gone, believe me. We’re never going to hear this again.
In English, and we are speaking English, aren’t we, Optics is “the scientific study of sight and the behavior of light, or the properties of transmission and deflection of other forms of radiation.” “Appearances” are the way things look, whether or not you’re using optics to look at them.
Frankly, people who think they’re being cute or erudite or educated by doing this have the *appearance of stupidity even if their optics are made by Zeiss or Nikon. Yes, I know the fake educational establishment in the US exists only to confirm solecisms and malapropisms as soon as they appear, but we’re getting rid of them: We’re going to have great grammar. It’s going to be fantastic.
About Post Author
Glenn Geist
More Stories
The Day My Identity Was Stolen
This is a true story. It happened to me. Don’t let yourself be a victim. If you are, there are...
When the Clock Stops
I’m a man of a certain age, as they say, although I’ve no real idea what that means. Aren’t we...
What About That Mysterious Signal From Space?
Did you know that on August 15, 1977, Ohio State University’s Big Ear radio telescope detected a strong radio signal...
Please Stop Killing Our Children
Trigger Warning: This is a fictionalized account of a school shooting, a common occurrence in the United States. It contains...
Alexa Needs To Stop Talking
I like a TV running as background noise throughout the day when I work. It used to be music, but...
Trump, Trust, and the Trials of Modern Journalism
Since 2015, Donald Trump’s overwhelming presence on our TV screens and in our digital and print newspapers has raised many...
Michael, IIANM it sounds as if you’ve already accepted some of the definition-creep here.
Perhaps you aren’t reading this as I wrote it. It’s all about “optics” you know 🙂
We’d be better off if there were fewer dumb appeals to optics. If you’re going to talk about optics, it should be based on either (a) ground-level reporting about what someone is actually doing, or (b) empirical data like poll numbers about how people react to things. If all you’re doing is inventing stuff that no one on the planet would have noticed if you hadn’t been hard up for material, then you’re responsible for making us collectively stupider and giving optics a bad name.