With No Hillary To Kick Around, The New York Times Decides To Go After Chelsea
Hillary Clinton’s not around anymore to act as an everyday punching bag, so how will New York Times politics writers stay in fighting trim? Well, it looks as if they’re found someone new to pound on: The Democratic Party today: Spends $8 million to elect an unelectable candidate who doesn’t live in district & there’s talk…
About Post Author
Professor Mike
More Stories
What in the World Happened to the Ginger Kitten?
The abrupt sound of multiple barks pierced the stillness of the night. It was an unsettling deviation from their customary...
Warning: Be Careful When Walking Your Dog In Alligator Country
Mike McCoy has read up a bit on alligator attacks and he knew what to do if you find yourself in one—and good thing too.
MadMikesAmerica To Remain Open For Business
We are staying open. MMA may not be as active as it once was, but why close this one, with all those articles still available to read, and maybe more to come?
Fox News Guest: Ghoulish Trump Has Blood On His Hands
Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) told Fox News on Sunday that former President Donald Trump is guilty of a “ghoulish” attempt to undermine the economy by downplaying the need for Covid-19 vaccinations.
Disgusting Ted Cruz Forgets History of Conservatives Like Elvis Promoting Vaccines
Recently, the beloved Sesame Street character Big Bird went on television and social media to promote COVID-19 vaccines. For anyone who has been conscious for at least a few years, celebrities—especially ones with larger fanbases amongst the youth of the country—promoting public health initiatives is not surprising. It has been going on forever and ever.
Crazy Louie Gohmert: Climate Action Would Force Us To Brush Our Teeth With Bark
[caption id="attachment_187456" align="aligncenter" width="615"] Getty images[/caption] by Aldous J. Pennyfarthing How the hell did Republican Louie Gohmert of Texas ever become...
Agreed on both. Peters and St Bernard.
Personally, I found Peter’s commentary to be pathetic. You are correct: Ossof did just fine, and will do fine in the runoff for one particular reason: time! Each and every day that passes sheds new light on the corrupt occupant in the White House. There are cries already about his lack of legislative achievement, and one must wonder, what exactly will occur should he not have anything accomplished by June, a likely scenario predicted by many!
The problem with Peters is him being part of a media which wants to create history versus recording it accurately! I have heard that critique about Ossof already and oddly it is being repeated by conservative talking heads like Scarbourgh and gang. Peters’ desire for Ossof to be “electric” while a subjective term at best, distorts what is needed to win that particular district: a sober minded, level headed Democrat who appeals also to Republicans!
Further, I am tired of Saint Bernard and his folks telling our Party who is and who is not a progressive. I am also tired of hearing those same people tell me and others who have been Democratic for years, how Saint Bernard is putting our party in order. I’ve got news for those people: when Bernard changes his party affiliation permanently to Democrat, and does do before it becomes convenient due to electoral politics, then I just might listen. Until then, I find him to be static electric!
As much as I hate to admit it, Starnes is correct in his analysis, not to mention Ossof beat their leading candidate by twenty points. THAT should have been the news, Also, the news should have been how his opponent literally tried to bring the Komen foundation to its knees as a result of her flawed ideology and failed several attempts to win an election. But don’t let Peters know this, huh?