Crazy Republicans plan on hearings to debunk global warming

Read Time:1 Minute, 44 Second

Fresh off a dramatic victory in which it retook the House leadership, the Republican Party intends to hold major hearings probing the supposed “scientific fraud” behind global warming.

The Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder related the news in a little-noticed article Wednesday morning.

The effort is a likely attempt to out-step the White House on energy policy moving forward. Legislation on energy and climate change reform, one of President Barack Obama campaign promises, has yet to materialize, though Obama’s EPA recently classified carbon dioxide as a pollutant.

Holding hearings would please the Republicans’ conservative base, which increasingly doubts the scientific basis for global warming — especially human-induced global warming — and provide a reflection of the new GOP’s tenor.

Ron Brownstein of the National Journal reported last week that in Tuesday’s midterm election, “virtually all of the serious 2010 GOP challengers” have denied that there is scientific evidence that global warming is even happening.

“The GOP is stampeding toward an absolutist rejection of climate science that appears unmatched among major political parties around the globe, even conservative ones,” Brownstein wrote.

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists — and just about every accredited international scientific institution in the world — unequivocally agree that global warming occurring and is fueled by human activity.

Scientists say inaction will lead to an unmitigated spiral of polarized — and over time rising — temperatures, melting ice caps, rising sea levels and droughts, among other consequences.

The Republican belief to the contrary incubates the party’s fervent opposition not only to cap and trade but to any measures reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The Obama administration has long anticipated efforts from the GOP to weaken the Environmental Protection Agency, and plan to strongly enforce environmental regulations.

The deeply differing views of the White House and likely energy chairman, Texas Republican Joe Barton, suggests that conflicts over the issue are inevitable in the new divided government.

Enhanced by Zemanta

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jess
13 years ago

Argh, I wish they would just walk off the face of the earth like some of them think they can. I swear, when did stupidity and ignorance become ok to get into higher office. No need, I have two words Tundra twit. She made it and some before her, to where it is ok to be a totally ignorant buffoon and make some noise and people will follow you off a cliff.

Stimpson
13 years ago

Why can’t Repubs get it through their thick skulls that “conservative” doesn’t mean “anti-science”?

I look at all this anti-AGW nonsense as self-centered rationalizations by people who want to continue driving SUVs, blasting the air conditioning, throwing away plastic bottles, etc unabated. Acknowledging the irreversible harm they’re doing and then stopping it would cramp their lifestyles, so they grab hold of pseudo facts and stupid arguments in resistance.

Reply to  Stimpson
13 years ago

Couldn’t agree with you more Stimpson. It’s as if you have to check your brain at the door to be accepted in the GOP fold.

stop whining democrats again Previous post Democrats – It won’t happen again, next time we’ll vote
Next post Will Rand Paul give the GOP a ‘shellacking’?
3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x