Floodgates of Falsehood – Hoover Dam and the Internet Kill Switch

We have all seen those hackers portrayed in the Hollywood movies. The ones with the serious computer powers that walk up to keyboard, start typing away, and in about 3 minutes they shut down the electric power to a city.

Fears of a scenario like that are being used by politicians to push legislation that would have far reaching consequences.

Legislation introduced by Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), known as “The Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act”, gives far reaching powers to the government.

Although expected not to run for office in 2012, Joe Lieberman currently is the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

The legislation includes language saying that the federal government’s designation of vital Internet or other computer systems “shall not be subject to judicial review.”

That definition includes a “provider of information technology”, something that gives a very wide coverage of power.

During a Washington panel hearing, Brandon Milhorn, staff director of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee stated …

“We are very concerned about an electronic control system that could cause the floodgates to come open at the Hoover Dam and kill thousands of people in the process. That’s a significant concern.”

That does present a very frighting visual, a hacker suddenly sending the command to begin pouring down and instantly killing thousands with a tsunami wall of water.

But the problem with that statement is that it’s impossible.

The Bureau of Reclamation, which runs the power-generating facility on the Arizona-Nevada state line, has repeatedly issued email and public statements trying to set the record straight.

Spokesman for the bureau, Peter Soeth..

“I’d like to point out that this is not a factual example, because Hoover Dam and important facilities like it are not connected to the internet. These types of facilities are protected by multiple layers of security, including physical separation from the internet, that are in place because of multiple security mandates and good business practices.”


But Washington has never been known to allow truth to stand in the way of an objective.

Current status of the legislation as of December 15, 2010 is that it has been “Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders” Record > here

As to the legislation, my main concern would be the broad powers given to the government to control the flow of information without judicial review. Power without oversight ALWAYS winds up being abused. We have already seen some of the abuses occurring by giving sweeping powers without judicial review with the Patriot Act.

Another concern would be that in order to perform this internet asset kill feature, that asset by definition has to be connected to the internet. Does that force that asset to be connected?

When the disconnect order given by the President is to be implemented, the assets are not physically going to be disconnected. The assets on this big list will be mass “switched off” by remotely controlling their internet servers. But doesn’t that give hackers also the ability to hack THAT feature?

Isn’t this like saying.. “During a national emergency, because terrorists will be driving cars, all cars will be shut off. But to tell you that we need to shut the cars off, we will be sending the message out to you by car.”

Security professionals already have procedures in place to guard against internet attacks of important infrastructure by having several layers of isolation by various methods. It is generally agreed that this is the best method of protection.

If that is the case, one wonders just what is the true purpose of the legislation?

Did you like this? Share it:
Posted by on February 9, 2011. Filed under Commentary,NEWS I FIND INTERESTING. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Back to Main Page

9 Responses to Floodgates of Falsehood – Hoover Dam and the Internet Kill Switch

  1. Michael John Scott Reply

    February 9, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    I have to agree with your final question. What is the purpose of this legislation and why do these clowns always feel the need to lie to us. Is it possible that the sponsors of the bill really didn’t know that the dam was separated from the internet?

    • Krell Reply

      February 9, 2011 at 1:51 pm

      If the sponsors, the ones that created the legislation, know that little about the security of the internet, what faith can you put in other “wisdom” they are trying to make law with this bill?

  2. mbarnato Reply

    February 9, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    Government by lies, lies, more lies, fear, and lack of accountability with devious undertones gets so frustrating. And here our poor founding fathers thought we could self-govern with reason. haha. The Ruling Corporatocracy would love nothing better than to get their hands on a kill switch, but that’s an interesting point about hacking the kill site. I think a group like Anonymous would give them a run for their money.

    I caught a bit of one of those “Earth Without People” shows that focussed on Hoover Dam. As you point out, there are multiple redundant operating protections built into the system. It’s a closed loop… But why let facts stand in the way of a good fear message?

    • Krell Reply

      February 9, 2011 at 2:01 pm

      mbarnato, did you see how Anonymous hacked the emails of 3 Data Security firms that were hired by the Bank Of America…

      “The three firms, Palantir Technologies, HBGary Federal and Berico Technologies, planned to “disrupt” Salon.com columnist Glenn Greenwald’s support of WikiLeaks, create a disinformation campaign to discredit the secrets outlet, sow discord among WikiLeaks volunteers, and use cyber attacks to target the website’s infrastructure.”

      • mbarnato Reply

        February 9, 2011 at 5:58 pm

        Krell, yes, I just came across the articles conveniently posted on someone’s site! :->

  3. SagaciousHillbilly Reply

    February 9, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    Of course this is ridiculous, but you’ll never convince the desperate masses that it’s ridiculous If they see it in a movie, they believe it’s true or possible.
    The idea of power plants, chemical processing facilities, Hoover Dam or any other kind of facility like that being on the internet and capable of getting hacked by some high school kid or even brilliant terrorist is simply absurd. . . hence, people like LIEberman and his ilk make big brother legislation in the name of public protection.
    Sorry all you poor dumb ignorant proles, but the boogie man doesn’t exist.

  4. Collin Hinds Reply

    February 9, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    Without judicial review. It’s never a good sign when someone wants to cut out a whole branch of the government. Lierberman is a screwball extraordinaire. If he isn’t completely nuts, he’s doing a bang-up job of impersonating someone who is.

  5. Omahwalkan Reply

    February 10, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    I applaud your observations and conclusions Krell! especially tricky territory when keeping in mind the profound difference the internet has and is making in an ongoing historical revolution of the moment!
    [But Washington has never been known to allow truth to stand in the way of an objective.]
    I agree. heartily. good job / post!

  6. Pingback: 21st Century FBI: An Embarrassment to Justice J. Edgar Would be Proud « Dandelion Salad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.