Nauru: Ground zero for global warming?

Global warming is caused by man and it’s getting hotter and hotter the world over

An insidious process in under way as I write this, a process started by man that may well spell the end of man.  As we meander through our days concerned about the debt ceiling, health care, and unemployment, along with elections, the price of gas, and intelligent design begin taught in schools, worlds within worlds are beginning to die, and they are dying from a disease that we invented and nurtured.  That disease is global warming.

Global warming as we are starting to experience it, is the continuing rise in the average temperature of Earth’s atmosphere and oceans. Global warming is caused by increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, resulting from human activities such as deforestation and burning of fossil fuels. This finding is recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized countries and is not disputed by any scientific body of national or international standing.  Note that I said any “scientific body,” as there are any number of companies and organizations that are spending fortunes to debunk the science for their own self interests.

You see an increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will change the amount and pattern of precipitation, and a probable expansion of subtropical deserts. Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic and would be associated with continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects of the warming include more frequent occurrence of extreme weather events including heatwaves, droughts and heavy rainfall events, species extinctions due to shifting temperature regimes, and changes in agricultural yields. Warming and related changes will vary from region to region around the globe, though the nature of these regional changes is uncertain. In a 4 °C world, the limits for human adaptation are likely to be exceeded in many parts of the world, while the limits for adaptation for natural systems would largely be exceeded throughout the world. Hence, the ecosystem services upon which human livelihoods depend would not be preserved.

As mentioned earlier, despite the overwhelming evidence there are still skeptics in this country,  and they are primarily on the Right side of the congressional aisle, led by their barkers and big mouths, Fox News, and Rush Limbaugh.  To get an idea of what it’s like to experience climate change in real time read about the island nation of Nauru.  The following New York Times article written by Marcus Stephen of Nauru is one that should capture the attention of all of us and make our hearts sad and our minds numb for what is happening to his country WILL happen to all of us, albeit in different ways perhaps

nauru: ground zero for global warming

I FORGIVE you if you have never heard of my country.

At just 8 square miles, about a third of the size of Manhattan, and located in the southern Pacific Ocean, Nauru appears as merely a pinpoint on most maps — if it is not missing entirely in a vast expanse of blue.

But make no mistake; we are a sovereign nation, with our own language, customs and history dating back 3,000 years. Nauru is worth a quick Internet search, I assure you, for not only will you discover a fascinating country that is often overlooked, you will find an indispensible cautionary tale about life in a place with hard ecological limits.

Phosphate mining, first by foreign companies and later our own, cleared the lush tropical rainforest that once covered our island’s interior, scarring the land and leaving only a thin strip of coastline for us to live on. The legacy of exploitation left us with few economic alternatives and one of the highest unemployment rates in the world, and led previous governments to make unwise investments that ultimately squandered our country’s savings.

I am not looking for sympathy, but rather warning you what can happen when a country runs out of options. The world is headed down a similar path with the relentless burning of coal and oil, which is altering the planet’s climate, melting ice caps, making oceans more acidic and edging us ever closer to a day when no one will be able to take clean water, fertile soil or abundant food for granted.

Climate change also threatens the very existence of many countries in the Pacific, where the sea level is projected to rise three feet or more by the end of the century. Already, Nauru’s coast, the only habitable area, is steadily eroding, and communities in Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands have been forced to flee their homes to escape record tides. The low-lying nations of Tuvalu, Kiribati and the Marshall Islands may vanish entirely within our grandchildren’s lifetimes.

Similar climate stories are playing out on nearly every continent, where a steady onslaught of droughts, floods and heat waves, which are expected to become even more frequent and intense with climate change, have displaced millions of people and led to widespread food shortages.

The changes have already heightened competition over scarce resources, and could foreshadow life in a world where conflicts are increasingly driven by environmental catastrophes.

Yet the international community has not begun to prepare for the strain they will put on humanitarian organizations or their implications for political stability around the world.

In 2009, an initiative by the Pacific Small Island Developing States, of which I am chairman, prompted the United Nations General Assembly to recognize the link between climate change and security. But two years later, no concrete action has been taken.

So I was pleased to learn that the United Nations Security Council will take up the issue tomorrow in an open debate, in which I will have the opportunity to address the body and reiterate my organization’s proposals.

First, the Security Council should join the General Assembly in recognizing climate change as a threat to international peace and security. It is a threat as great as nuclear proliferation or global terrorism. Second, a special representative on climate and security should be appointed. Third, we must assess whether the United Nations system is itself capable of responding to a crisis of this magnitude.

The stakes are too high to implement these measures only after a disaster is already upon us. Negotiations to reduce emissions should remain the primary forum for reaching an international agreement. We are not asking for blue helmets to intervene; we are simply asking the international community to plan for the biggest environmental and humanitarian challenge of our time.

Nauru has begun an intensive program to restore the damage done by mining, and my administration has put environmental sustainability at the center of our policymaking. Making our island whole again will be a long and difficult process, but it is our home and we cannot leave it for another one.

I forgive you if you have never heard of Nauru — but you will not forgive yourselves if you ignore our story.

Marcus Stephen is the president of Nauru.

The threat is real and we are starting to see the beginning of a process that will continue for perhaps centuries.  Most frightening is the fact that major changes in our climate will begin to take place in as little as 20 years and the earth will take on a different look entirely, as millions of people are forced to leave their homes to find water and food.  Global warming is here to stay and we need to recognize it and begin to prepare, for it is too late to stop it.

Did you like this? Share it:
Posted by on July 20, 2011. Filed under Commentary,Environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Back to Main Page

4 Responses to Nauru: Ground zero for global warming?

  1. Teeluck Reply

    July 20, 2011 at 7:39 am

    I shudder to think of the future as the non-believers thunder ahead with no regard for science and their dire warnings…because their ‘god’ will solve everything.

  2. Barry West Reply

    July 20, 2011 at 1:28 pm

    I’m with Mr. Tee on this one, because my reading tells me the shit is going to really hit the fan one of these days not in the distant future.

    • RickRay Reply

      July 20, 2011 at 7:59 pm

      Maybe if we renamed it “climate armageddon” the GOP might begin to take interest, but not likely because the word climate is in the expression.

  3. DanBronx Reply

    April 8, 2012 at 12:14 am

    So what’s your solution? That modern civilization revert back to a hunter-gatherer society? Live in mud huts and cook our food over a fire pit? Oh wait, can’t do that because that will also entail felling trees and releasing carbon into the atmosphere. Zero-emission nuclear plants? Can’t do that, too risky (plus it’s a Republican thing).

    Force industries to use windmills and solar energy? Can’t do that b’cuz you’ll still need to the to burn fossil fuel to power the machinery to produce and assemble the parts and vehicles to transport them to market.

    Low-emission Natural Gas? Don’t want that because of that one video of a tap catching on fire.

    Oh I know. Blame everyone who’s a Republican. Just not Obama + Democrats who gets to roll around in his fossil fueled limo and jets about in Air Force One.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.