Earth’s Oldest Trees Dying at 10 Times Normal Rate

Read Time:1 Minute, 29 Second
A pair of giant redwoods tower above a walkway at the Muir Woods National Monument in Marin County, Calif., March 31, 2008. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)

Let’s face it, there are just too many people in the world.  We’re burning, building, and polluting at an alarming rate.  Add this to a warming planet, a change in climate accelerated by man’s indifference to protecting the ozone layer, and you have a deadly witches’ brew of extinction, extermination, and eradication of our planet’s life.  Here’s Newser’s summary:

In what one researcher calls a “very, very disturbing trend,” new research finds that the planet’s oldest trees have started dying at 10 times the normal rate, a change that could greatly damage the planet’s ecosystems and biodiversity. Researchers blame logging, development, drought, and climate change for the decline of 100- to 300-year-old trees, reports AFP, a new reality found at all latitudes on every continent that is home to them.

“Just as large-bodied animals such as elephants, tigers, and cetaceans have declined drastically in many parts of the world, a growing body of evidence suggests that large old trees could be equally imperiled,” said the study’s lead author. Among the trees at risk: mountain ash in Australia, pine trees in America, California redwoods, and baobabs in Tanzania. And the decline endangers more than just the woods, as up to 30% of birds and animals in some areas find shelter in those large trees. “Their loss could mean extinction for such creatures,” says the researcher.

Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.

If you liked our story please share it at REDDIT.COM and PINTEREST as well as TUMBLR.

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
11 years ago

Too many people is exactly it. And far too many of them “need” cars, air conditioning, and refrigerators. All power generation and consumption generates heat. It doesn’t matter if it’s solar, wind, hydro, or nuclear. every amp eventually becomes heat. Turn a generator and it becomes warm, use an electric motor and it releases heat.

Even if every vehicle in the world were electric, it wouldn’t change the heat pollution a bit. The laws of physics are uncaring and inflexible.

I have had the thought that the quality of life, at least in the USA, peaked somewhere around 1955 when there were about 150 million people there.

At least it peaked if you were a white male and protestant. Still, social issues aside, if there were fewer people in the world, perhaps the ecology could handle the pollution.

Previous post Peter Higgs and the elusive particle
Next post 10 top stories for today-December 7, 2012
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x