If you want to lose weight just stop eating

Read Time:2 Minute, 43 Second

Of course you’ve heard of the Scarsdale diet, the South Beach diet, and the almighty Atkins. But if you’re tired of counting carbs and fats, why not just give up eating altogether?

 That's one way to lose weight. ThinkStock/iStockphoto
That’s one way to lose weight. ThinkStock/iStockphoto

That’s the crux of the latest weight-loss fad: The Fast Diet. Dr. Michael Mosley of Britain has created a semi-starved army with his best-selling book of the same title. Also known as the 5:2 Diet, the gist is that you eat whatever you want five days a week, and then the other two days, you “fast” by consuming a quarter of your normal daily allotment of calories.

The theory is that you’ll be “starving long enough to convince your body to start feeding off your fat stores, but not so long that it slows down your metabolism.” Mosley says it’s only the “least bit painful,” and to treat those two days as “just a break from your normal routine.” Crazy as it sounds, The Fast Diet is flying off shelves, and true-believers are singing its praises. Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall at The Guardian writes that he “finds the whole thing rather exhilarating” and that he “might just be part of a health revolution.”

Mosley also claims that intermittent fasting carries benefits that other diets don’t. He tells the Huffington Post that “on a standard diet you lose about 75 percent fat, 25 percent muscle,” but on the Fast Diet “it’s between 85 and 100 percent fat.” Mosley also tells The Boston Globe that the body enters “repair mode” when it’s fasting and that “a lot of cellular repair takes place in between meals.” The onset of dementia may even be delayed through intermittent fasting, Mosley says, though studies supporting this claim have only been conducted on mice.

Of course, not everyone is jumping on the hungry bandwagon of Fast Diet devotees. The U.K. National Health Service has created a site to qualify the benefits and stress the potential downsides of going 5:2. You’d think that you wouldn’t need to tell people that dehydration, anxiety, and irritability are all potential side effects of essentially not eating for two days a week, but then again, you probably would also think a disclaimer that intermittent fasting “may not be suitable for pregnant women” would be unnecessary. Unsurprisingly, the NHS is highly skeptical of the purported long-term benefits of the Fast Diet, and is loathe to endorse it as a healthy means to weight loss.

There’s also the practical question of how you define eating “normally” the other five days. Mosley cautions: When you’re not fasting, “don’t pig out, don’t bury your face in the ice cream, but if you occasionally go out for a burger that’s fine.” That still sounds deceptively diet-y to me. You’re still supposed to eat healthfully (again, what exactly that means is not abundantly clear) on the five days. So even if you suffer through your two days of hunger pains, it’s not exactly going to be a gala of gluttony on the other five.

By of The Week

Follow MadMike’sAmerica on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to visit our HOME PAGE.

About Post Author

Guest Contributor

Guest contributors are those who provide commentary, advice, or other food for thought designed to entertain and enlighten our readers.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10 years ago

I would love to have the body of Bruce Lee in his prime but, in order to achieve this I would have to train and eat sensibly and, possibly, be very good at Kung Fu.

The very thought of giving up beer and vodka and curry and chocolate is enough to give me a heart attack.

The option of giving myself a heart attack by eating chocolate and curry and drinking beer and vodka is very much the lesser of two evils.

I can at least die drunk and stuffed with my favourite food.

Reply to  Norman Rampart
10 years ago

Norman, you do not have to give up any of those things. Go to my page shown above and read the essay. Leave a message and I’ll email you a copy of the entire book. In fact, I will for anyone that would like it.

Personally, I have not given up beer, scotch, chocolate cake, or ice cream. No, I don’t have them all at once, but that might make an interesting experiment. 😉

10 years ago

How many of you want to live like this forever?

This is why diets do not work – ever. I have previously said here and in my blog “The Cruel Truth About Fat”

https://slrman.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/the-cruel-truth-about-fat/

That often, dieters end up heavier. The real solution is to start eating a little less on a gradual basis until you bring your calorie intake and use into a balance. It doesn’t mean giving up everything that you like to eat, it means moderating what you do. That’s something most people can do. It’s nothing radical. It doesn’t require hours in a gym or making yourself miserable.

Bill Formby
10 years ago

I would have some health concerns about this diet. It is probably OK but it just seems not to be a good idea to play with your body’s metabolism like that.

Reply to  Bill Formby
10 years ago

Bill, you have a legitimate concern. As I mention in the article referenced in my other post below, yo-yo dieting is not a healthy thing to do.

Rachael
10 years ago

This actually works. Two years ago I had ballooned to 135 pounds, a lot for me, and I couldn’t get it off so I didn’t eat on weekends. I did this for about 6 months and lost close to 20 pounds. When I resumed eating I did so in a more responsible manner.

Previous post Don’t Blame Islam for Boston Marathon Bombing
Next post Five killed in snowboarding avalanche
6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x