Net Neutrality Died Yesterday and How It May Affect You

Read Time:2 Minute, 2 Second

verdict_action (1)

Yesterday a federal court rejected FCC Open Internet regulations to ensure Internet service providers can’t discriminate when it comes to web traffic.  This ruling may have a huge impact on the way we use the internet.

In Verizon v. FCC, the Washington, DC, court found that ISPs can legally prioritize or block some traffic, the Washington Post reports. The court did, however, rule that providers have to tell users when they’re doing so, the Verge notes. ISPs, according to the court, aren’t “common carriers” like older telecom firms—so they’re not subject to rules against prioritizing information.

The decision may mean major changes for the everyday user, and today, media sites are offering the details. Among their warnings:

  • The Wall Street Journal reports that the decision could have a huge impact on sites like Netflix and YouTube, whose video services hog a lot of bandwidth (they account for 32% and 19% of peak web traffic, respectively). If ISPs start making Netflix, for instance, pay a usage fee to maintain speedy content delivery, that cost could make a serious dent in its profits—or trickle down to consumers.
  • ISPs could charge sites big fees in exchange for faster content delivery, potentially giving giants who can pay, like Amazon, a big leg up over independent retailers—not to mention other small businesses, the Huffington Post notes. Providers might even go so far as to prioritize traffic to partner sites—Time Warner might push CNN, for example.
  • Another anti-competitive fear, via BuzzFeed: Big companies might start paying your data fees for the use of their sites. That might sound good—free data?—but it would mean that companies with the ability to pay would have a major advantage over start-ups in winning users. As BuzzFeed points out, “If, in this future, you’re choosing between two streaming music services, and one of them pays for your data, there’s a very good chance you’re going to pick that one.”
  • Beyond concerns over fees, there are worries that providers could block certain websites completely: Comcast users could theoretically end up with no access to, say, Netflix or Vonage, writes Troy Wolverton in the San Jose Mercury News.
  • But net neutrality, in some form, may live to see another day, the Journal notes, reporting that the ruling “left open the door for the FCC to craft rules in a different form that might accomplish its earlier intentions.”

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10 years ago

One more reason why I do not live in the USA.

Bill Formby
Reply to  Professor Mike
10 years ago

Mike, I look for it to get worse before it gets better. The Republicans keep preaching about getting rid of big government but they are trading it for big business.

Previous post Atheists: All 10 Commandments Violate US Constitution
Next post Top 10 News Stories for Today, January 15, 2014
3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x