Lurching Toward Extinction: Abrupt, Unpredictable and Potentially Irreversible Climate Change

Read Time:3 Minute, 20 Second
Epic drought in California.  Pic courtesy of huffingtonpost.com. Read more at https://madmikesamerica.com/2014/03/lurching-toward-humanity-abrupt-unpredictable-and-potentially-irreversible-changes/
Epic drought in California. Pic courtesy of huffingtonpost.com.
Read more at https://madmikesamerica.com/2014/03/lurching-toward-humanity-abrupt-unpredictable-and-potentially-irreversible-changes/

The American Association for the Advancement of Science is the world’s largest general scientific society.  It boasts a membership of 121,200 scientists and “science supporters” globally, and it has just released an 18-page report confirming that the world is at growing risk of “abrupt, unpredictable and potentially irreversible changes” due to climate change, according to Salon.com.

It’s called, simply, “What We Know,” and the facts it presents follow three basic assertions about climate change as presented here and summarized by its authors:

1. The reality:

“Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening. This agreement is documented not just by a single study, but by a converging stream of evidence over the past two decades from surveys of scientists, content analyses of peer-reviewed studies, and public statements issued by virtually every membership organization of experts in this field. Average global temperature has increased by about 1.4˚ F over the last 100 years. Sea level is rising, and some types of extreme events – such as heat waves and heavy precipitation events – are happening more frequently. Recent scientific findings indicate that climate change is likely responsible for the increase in the intensity of many of these events in recent years.”

2. The risks:

“Earth’s climate is on a path to warm beyond the range of what has been experienced over the past millions of years. The range of uncertainty for the warming along the current emissions path is wide enough to encompass massively disruptive consequences to societies and ecosystems: as global temperatures rise, there is a real risk, however small, that one or more critical parts of the Earth’s climate system will experience abrupt, unpredictable and potentially irreversible changes. Disturbingly, scientists do not know how much warming is required to trigger such changes to the climate system.”

3. The response:

“Waiting to take action will inevitably increase costs, escalate risk, and foreclose options to address the risk. The CO2 we produce accumulates in Earth’s atmosphere for decades, centuries, and longer. It is not like pollution from smog or wastes in our lakes and rivers, where levels respond quickly to the effects of targeted policies. The effects of CO2 emissions cannot be reversed from one generation to the next until there is a large- scale, cost-effective way to scrub carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Moreover, as emissions continue and warming increases, the risk increases.”

The scientists explained that none of this is up for debate any longer. What’s yet to be determined, however, is how many of those possibilities will come to pass, along with what we can and should do to mitigate the risks. In what the Guardian characterizes as a rare intervention into policy debate, the AAAS is hoping that making the scientific consensus as clear as possible, they can help advance the conversation to focus on the things we actually need to be debating right now. “Because so many people are confused about the science,”the New York Times explains, “the nation has never really had a frank political discussion about the options.”

“What’s extremely clear is that there’s a risk, a very significant risk,” Mario Molina, the head of the committee that produced the report, told the Times. “You don’t need 100 percent certainty for society to act.”

It’s unlikely that even 100 percent certainty would make the science denying Republicans act. Since they control the congress and may well control the senate after the 2014 elections, any changes designed to limit greenhouse gases is doubtful.  Driven by greed and religious mythology the United States is destined to lag behind the rest of the world when it comes to actually doing something about global warming.

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Timmy Mahoney
10 years ago

No. There’s little we can do anyway, because too much time has passed. Greed will overwhelm the world and the republicans will go to their graves denying science. Sad.

Marsha Woerner
10 years ago

Scary indeed! I’m sharing this article, and I do have some Republican and right-wing friends (and family members, including a father with an IQ of about 200 who was a scientist and has decided to join the ridiculous and unreal party – oh, did I say that? My father is almost 85, so the fact that he’s getting a bit forgetful isn’t that surprising, either). But I don’t think that any of them will care, because they don’t believe in climate change! Just as I do not go for conspiracy theories, they don’t go for our “left wing nonsense” which doesn’t match any of their preconceptions. I’m afraid that there’s really nothing we can do 🙁

Rachael
10 years ago

Wow Mike. Good job with this article. Scary. I think you should send it to the republicans.

Previous post Flight 370 Update: Chinese Spot Large Piece of Debris in Indian Ocean
Next post People Watching and Politicians Lying
3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x