Almost All Ocean Plastic Gone-But That’s Not Good News

Read Time:1 Minute, 26 Second

There are millions and millions of tons of man-made plastic floating in the world’s oceans, presenting a hazard to navigation and to fish, at least that was the case a couple of years ago.   It seems, according to a new study, that most of it, up to 99%, is missing!  Unfortunately that may not be good news.

ocean-plastic

It seems that marine animals could be ingesting our garbage, reports the Verge. Up to 99% of the most microscopic plastic particles in the ocean is missing, says a study co-author. Science Mag reports that they went looking for it between 2010 and 2011 around five large ocean gyres—the most famous such island of waste is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch—and augmented their search with studies of 3,070 samples from other expeditions, according toLiveScience. What did they find? That there is at most 40,000 tons of plastic in our oceans, even though humans produce 300 million tons of plastic a year, and 0.1% of that ends up in the oceans via rivers, floods, storms, or ships, says Science Mag.

The ocean’s plastics are microscopic—ground to tiny pieces by waves and solar radiation until it looks like fish food. A scientist not associated with the study says it’s “indisputable” that lanternfish and other small fish are eating the plastic—and it’s impossible to know exactly how much. These small fish, which are likely ingesting toxins like DDT, PCBs, or mercury, are then gobbled by commercial fish. “We are part of this food web,” says a study co-author. Scientists say further research is needed, especially since estimates about how much plastic is entering the ocean is 50 years old.

About Post Author

Hunter Steele

Colonel Steele is a retired military officer with a deep and abiding interest in history and politics. His views are often considered controversial but his thoughts and observations have been echoed in various publications.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Linda
3 years ago

Evolution is behind this. Bacteria have evolved that can eat plastic. The more plastic, the happier and fatter these little guys become. Just like algae eaters, they have a job cleaning up the oceans and lands. However, on another note:
Maybe instead of disproven vaccines, we should check plastic levels in normal and autistic children.

9 years ago

Relatively recently, after many decades of struggle, it was announced that organophosphate pesticides (Dursban, Malathion and many others) are far more toxic than was previously admitted by manufacturers and previously acknowledged by the EPA. Chlorpyrophos (Dursban) was banned for “home” use, but pest control professionals are still able to use it. This after decades of denial by chemical manufacturers and methodical stonewalling of EPA regulations by employing the now common tactic of manufacturers presenting “their studies” to refute independent studies. You may recall similar, but less sophisticated, tactics being employed by chemical manufacturers of organochlorine pesticides (DDT and relatives), tobacco, asbestos, and others.

Now we learn that there is a strong connection between organophosphates and autism: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/autism-risk-higher-near-pesticide-treated-fields/

We faced similar struggles with endocrine disruptors…until the EPA finally (FINALLY) got around to condemning BpA and other xenoestrogenic compounds – which led to BpA-free this and that – but it’s still in food can liners.

Relative to the GPGP and other toxic islands of waste, what’s my point? My point is that plastic waste in the food chain (and wiping out the food chain, as it does when larger species consume enough of the ‘whole’ plastic films and other materials to kill themselves) will be much like mercury in the food chain. Denial isn’t just a river in Egypt, as they say, and we face decades of denial from the fishing industry and food distributors who will, no doubt, claim that ingestion of this plastic waste in the human diet is harmless.

Humans are guilty of many things, but one of the most surprising is the gullible, self-sacrificing willingness to be unwitting subjects in an uncontrolled experiment being conducted by industries on the worldwide population. For some reason we are willing to subject ourselves to toxic chemicals, GMOs, growth hormones, rampant overuse of antibiotics, widespread exposures to hormone-mimics, massive consumption of sugars and salts in lieu of real food, mechanical processes that puncture pathogens into the flesh of meats we consume, and many other highly suspect contaminants. For some reason, flaming tap-water isn’t evidence enough of the hazards of fracking. Oil spills that decimate the Gulf of Mexico don’t really phase us.

I’ll add that the phenomenon also resembles the self-destructive tendency of lower-middleclass and middleclass individual to succumb to the siren song of so-called “conservative values language” rather than scrutinizing the policies of those same conservative politicians. The so-called Reagan Democrats were stunningly oblivious to the self-inflicted harm they endured at the hands of Republicans who systematically dismantled unions and the middleclass in much the same way as Sentinels (Squids) in the Matrix dismantled the craft of the resistance. When Reagan destroyed the Air Traffic Controllers’ union, where was the outrage? Instead, “Joe Sixpack” sided with Reagan and turned on the unions.

There’s a common thread here. We, as a society, will ignore threats such as climate change and even defend the corporations most responsible for creating these problems rather than attempt to hold them accountable. We’ll pretend that the GPGP is not a problem…that pesticides are just fine, that endocrine disruptors that are causing premature puberty and a broad variety of reproductive abnormalities pose no real threat, that drilling in the oceans isn’t a necessary evil as much as it is a boon to the economy.

Humans seem to suffer from a disease. The disease is greed. But the greed is far more insidious than it appears on the surface. Those that “have theirs” have an understandable greed. But what drives the rest of us to accept the truly harmful byproducts of their greed? I believe that those of us who “do NOT have theirs” will tolerate the effluent of greed because we are gamblers at heart. We, as humans, are like lottery addicts. We will endure virtually perpetual, inevitable loss on the very long-shot chance that we, too, will get ours one day. And we don’t want to do anything that might undermine our chance to grab a piece of the poisoned pie.

Reply to  Jim Moore
9 years ago

Jim this is going to be a full fledged post. Excellent run down. Thanks man!

9 years ago

Bit, by bit, we’re making our homes unlivable. Perhaps the next great wars will be for water and livable land where people will only be poisoned slowly.

Previous post White House: SCOTUS Jeopardizes Women’s Health With Insane Hobby Lobby Ruling
Next post Jesus Surprised At US World Cup Success
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x