Scientists Are Bringing Back Extinct Species

Read Time:19 Second

This article originally appeared on The Conversation. De-extinction–the science of reviving species that have been lost–has moved from the realm of science-fiction to something that is now nearly feasible. Some types of lost mammals, birds or frogs may soon be able to be revived through de-extinction technologies. But just because we can, does it mean we…

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Glenn R. Geist
6 years ago

But face it, we all want to see mammoths, even if only as zoo animals. I see the extinction of many species as a crime against nature and can’t understand why undoing that is bad. I’m not talking Jurassic Park – nobody is, but maybe a Pleistocene park? Cocos are cute too.

We almost made the bison extinct and if rescuing that species was good, would it have been bad if they were gone and we brought them back?

Glenn R. Geist
6 years ago

“There are things man was not meant to know (or do) ” is the theme behind most of the cheap sci-fi movies of the last century. Perhaps it started with Mary Shelley and Frankenstein, but space travel, nuclear power and countless other things have been portrayed as dangerous, deadly and the product of human arrogance. What was that story about Icarus trying to tell us?

If we hadn’t “messed with” Mother Nature we’d never have become a species, much less a successful one. Our very morphology reflects a million or so years of technology, small jaw, small teeth, much smaller digestive system and of course large brain. Mostly because we invented, knives and fire and weapons. OK maybe not large enough brains, but it beats the chimps. Remember when it gets to be 20 below how it messes with nature when you turn the heat on.

We are not even capable of living without technology. Most of our occupied territory would be uninhabitable without modifying nature.

Evangelista Torricelli was punished by the Church because his barometer “messed with nature” most scientists were and even Ben Franklin faced the wrath of the retros for flaunting god/nature with his lightning rod. At least we didn’t hang the Wright Brothers because you know, man was not meant to fly. Don’t even start on the hubris of vaccines and antibiotics much less GMOs.

Besides it wasn’t necessarily nature that made many species extinct. We did it. It amazes me that the technophobic spirit persists as it does. Yes our success has overpopulated the planet, but that wasn’t a technological choice – it was Mother Nature.

6 years ago

We should have learned by now it’s not a good idea to mess with Mother Nature.

Brooke
Reply to  Rachael
6 years ago

You got that right Rachael. We never do learn and probably never will. Our arrogance won’t let us.

Previous post TIME: Russia’s War On America Via Social Media
Next post Tornado Warning: Why, How and When Do Tornadoes Occur?
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x