We Need To Stop Manipulating Las Vegas Tragedy To Support Political Views

Read Time:3 Minute, 44 Second
Jack Hunter
Displayed with permission from Rare

More than 50 concertgoers were killed Sunday night in Las Vegas and more than 400 were injured in the worst mass shooting in U.S. history. By Monday morning, when we still knew nothing about the motives of alleged shooter 64-year-old Stephen Paddock, the politics had already begun.

Many Democrats immediately called for more gun control, noting that Nevada has some of the laxest gun laws in the U.S. However, it appears that the shooter used a fully automatic weapon already banned by federal law. And even the few exceptions to that law still leave it extremely difficult for individuals to get their hands on weapons so lethal.  Such weapons are so “highly regulated” in the U.S. that it “was unclear how Paddock would have acquired an automatic weapon, if he did use one,” the Washington Post reported Monday.

RELATED: Congress Poised To Lift Restrictions of Silencers

In other words, it is highly likely that the shooter had an illegal firearm. If that’s the case, more gun laws would have done nothing to stop this tragedy.

Nor would “good guys with guns” stopped the shooting, something pro-gun advocates often say. Paddock carried out his carnage from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay hotel, out of reach of any legal firearms carriers below.

Those eager to make this tragedy about gun control are going to run into a lot of factual difficulties, not just political ones.

On the right, some were anxious to pin the killing on the left, radical Islam and even the government.

One of the more popular posts among conservatives was an apparent hoax that the far-left anti-fascist group Antifa was claiming the shooter as one of their own. Later, ISIS claimed responsibility for the shooting, with some conservatives all too eager to share that story, as if ISIS didn’t already claim to carry out every mass killing capturing America’s attention. Officials say that at the moment there is no credible evidence ISIS was behind that attack.

So, no, it does not look like terrorists, of the socialist or Muslim variety, were behind this.

Trying to pin the blame on a seemingly run-of-the-mill MSNBC-loving Democrat became a sudden mission for too many right wingers. Perhaps the wackiest attempt: The Gateway Pundit — a White House-credentialed, right wing site — claiming the shooter was a Rachel Maddow-loving anti-Trump Democrat named Geary Danley, who merely shared a last name with a woman of interest in the case. The evidence? “The briefest look at the viral threads and tweets falsely naming Geary Danley as the attacker makes it easy to guess why a bunch of right-wing trolls latched onto him,” the Washington Post reported. “His Facebook profile indicated that he might be a liberal.”

Then there were some in Alex Jones-land, an Infowars host named David Knight, who called the Las Vegas shooting a “false flag,” something Jones and his minions have claimed about virtually every mass shooting, ever. For conspiracy theorists, there is no such thing as an evil or deranged person committing a terrible act of violence. It’s always the government.

It’s disgusting how far conspiracy theorists have gone to claim Sandy Hook and other mass shootings didn’t really happen. But Alex Jones and others like him are simply the most extreme examples of ideologues eager to use national tragedies to advance their political agendas.

RELATED: Nevada Has No Laws Restricting Gun Ownership, Automatic Weapons, Open Carry and More

On this Monday, not even 24 hours since the worst gun massacre in American history, we should not be pointing fingers based on ignorance, half-cocked speculation or conspiracy theories. It is not only inaccurate, but worse, it’s disrespectful to the deceased and their families. We should be contemplating and learning, yes, but we should also be mourning.

Imagine what the families of the these victims must think to see the shocking sudden loss of their loved one become a platform for partisans and kooks. No one wants to hear that noise right now. It helps nothing and hurts many.

President Trump called the shooting “an act of pure evil” on Monday. He said of the victims’ families, “We cannot fathom their pain, we cannot imagine their loss.”

We can’t fathom or imagine it, which is why everyone, in this tragically tender moment, should stop politicizing it.

About Post Author

Guest Contributor

Guest contributors are those who provide commentary, advice, or other food for thought designed to entertain and enlighten our readers.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Glenn R. Geist
6 years ago

I should point out that the bump stock has a lower rate of fire than a gas or recoil operated rifle, for the most part. But far, far higher than a semi-automatic gun. We need to get them off the market. Today wouldn’t be too soon.

Bill Formby
Reply to  Glenn R. Geist
6 years ago

That is what I was trying to remember, “Bump Stock”. I am not sure if I got the operation quite right. I was trying to follow what someone was describing on TV.

Glenn R. Geist
6 years ago

There are several gizmos. One attaches to the trigger guard and when you turn a little crank, it works the trigger. The “bump stock” attaches to the stock and has a spring mechanism that lets the entire gun slide back and forth with the recoil while you hold your finger on the trigger. I’ve seen one that allows you to couple several rifles and fire the barrels alternately like a Gatling gun. It’s all legal and perhaps because the laws restricting automatic weapons were written before anyone thought of a way around them and restrict only what was on the market in the 1930s, but when laws are written to control technology, the bone heads who write laws know little and write dumb laws.

I’m reminded at how modern headlights were illegal in the US for a long time because laws written 70 or 80 years ago mandated “sealed beam” lights instead of best available technology. Anyway we need to start banning these devices which have no legitimate use except to get around a necessary law.

Neil Bamforth
6 years ago

I heard on the radio today that you can legally buy some ‘gizmo’ that can turn a semi into an automatic?

Mind you, why the hell would anyone outside the military want even a semi???

Any thoughts?

Best regards,

Bewildered and befuddled of Britain

Reply to  Neil Bamforth
6 years ago

Americans love their guns, as much as the English love their fish and chips I’ll wager. The bigger the gun the badder they feel.

Bill Formby
Reply to  Neil Bamforth
6 years ago

Turns out you are right Neil and he had several of them. They are called Bumpers or bouncers or something like that. The best I can figure is that it does not let the bolt reset on a semi automatic so by holding the trigger down each time a round is fired the bolt goes back far enough to eject the casing and pull up the next round but doesn’t allow the bolt to reseat itself so it it immediately fires the next round because the trigger is engaged.

6 years ago

I don’t think a silencer was a practical addition. I’ve never seen one on a rifle, although perhaps it’s possible. I have however fired a pistol with a silencer and it was quieter than without it, but still loud.

There is no real legitimate reason for having a silencer. The one given is hard to say with a straight face. The only reason for making them legal is to have another bone to throw to the firearms anarchists. There are millions who live in terror of having their guns confiscated and the NRA spends a fortune filling their mailboxes with dire warnings that the “gun grabbers” are even now hiding in the bushes ready to grab their guns. Perhaps even Hillary personally. As with most things, it’s not about the stated principles, unless you spell principle M.O.N.E.Y Gun stores and gun stocks have been doing poorly and the silencer thing has only been proposed to boost traffic and sales.

Bill Formby
6 years ago

Good luck with the non politicizing it. It is impossible to imagine that in this country right now. Although, I imagine that Trump may be thankful, in a way, so that he gets off the front page about the Russia probe, the Puerto Rico debacle, the Price scandal, and the North Korea twitter war. All he had to do was stand there and say a few insincere words about this tragedy, and trust me, they were insincere. Someone wrote him a script that included something about victims and God and did not include a bunch of stuff about himself is the ONLY reason we did not hear his personal take on the shooting. There is little doubt that Trump is a one trick pony. He gets on one thing at a time and he hammers it until all of the air is out of it. Don’t confuse and ask him to deal with two or more things at once.
While I agree with the non partisanship I think Hillary Clinton made a good point. How many would he had killed had he had a silencer which is about to be brought up by the Senate. I guess it is a bit crass but you can bet the farm on one thing, nothing is too crass for the Republicans to try to cash in on I believe. They are hard nose get what they want people and the only thing stopping them now is that they did not get a real Republican for president,

6 years ago

Very well said indeed!

Reply to  Glenn Geist
6 years ago

Jack did a good job with this piece. I had to publish it, so let’s hope someone in Congress will take notice. NAH. Probably not.

Previous post Skipping Breakfast May Double Risk of Hardening Arteries
Next post 4 Essential Reads: When Gun Control Makes a Difference
10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x