Stormy Daniels Tale Takes Another Twist

by Michael John Scott

Was Stormy paid off?  Of course, she was, but she’s being coy about it.

Stormy Daniels kept people guessing about her alleged affair with President Trump Tuesday—even after a full denial was issued. In a statement, the former porn star said she was denying the affair, not because she “was paid hush money,” but “because it never happened.”

TMZ, however, noted that the signature on the statement was very different to other examples of her signature—and Daniels herself commented on the difference when she appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live later Tuesday. “Did you sign this letter that was released today?” Kimmel asked. “I don’t know, did I?” she replied. “That doesn’t look like my signature, does it?”

Related: Melania Trump Pens Open Letter to Donald Trump

Mediaite reports that when Kimmel kept pressing, Daniels hinted that she could be bound by a non-disclosure agreement.

In the rest of the interview, Daniels—who described the alleged 2006 affair in detail to In Touch magazine in 2011—acted like “someone talking under a pretty elaborate non-disclosure agreement, while still doing her damnedest to be an engaging talk show guest,” according to the AV Club.

She refused to discuss the alleged affair, even when Kimmel read excerpts from the In Touch interview and tried to communicate using puppets. In a pre-recorded segment, she held up a doll of herself wearing a gag when Kimmel held up a Trump doll.

Following the interview, her attorney told the Guardian that it was definitely Daniels’ signature on the statement, and she was just “having fun on Kimmel and being her normal playful self.”

Edited via  Newser.

Did you like this? Share it:
Posted by on January 31, 2018. Filed under News,NEWS I FIND INTERESTING,Political. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Back to Main Page

6 Responses to Stormy Daniels Tale Takes Another Twist

  1. jess Reply

    January 31, 2018 at 11:19 am

    Jimmy should have just asked her to leave after the first question she did not answer and tell his audience, nope not going there with this one, it was not useful at all.

  2. Joe Hagstrom Reply

    January 31, 2018 at 11:57 am

    The real question is how can Trump claim to not like sex with women who have given birth yet be okay with a porno queen whom by nature of the business and the instruments her co-stars wield has experienced some large things herself.

    • jess Reply

      January 31, 2018 at 12:07 pm

      Not only that Joe but she said during the interview back in the day it was generic sex they had. Sorry, not sorry but if I am going to be fucking a porn star I don’t want generic sex, I want what a porn star is capable of doing in his movies sex.

  3. Michael45 Reply

    January 31, 2018 at 6:31 pm

    I expect she had signed a NDA when given the $130k and was warned before going on Kimmel.

    • jess Reply

      January 31, 2018 at 6:37 pm

      I wonder, because when it happened she spoke out loud about it for an interview so it’s out there already for all to see.

  4. Rachael Reply

    January 31, 2018 at 6:48 pm

    That was a weird appearance. A nothingburger.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.