Stormy Daniels Tale Takes Another Twist

Read Time:1 Minute, 25 Second

by Michael John Scott

Was Stormy paid off?  Of course, she was, but she’s being coy about it.

Stormy Daniels kept people guessing about her alleged affair with President Trump Tuesday—even after a full denial was issued. In a statement, the former porn star said she was denying the affair, not because she “was paid hush money,” but “because it never happened.”

TMZ, however, noted that the signature on the statement was very different to other examples of her signature—and Daniels herself commented on the difference when she appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live later Tuesday. “Did you sign this letter that was released today?” Kimmel asked. “I don’t know, did I?” she replied. “That doesn’t look like my signature, does it?”

Related: Melania Trump Pens Open Letter to Donald Trump

Mediaite reports that when Kimmel kept pressing, Daniels hinted that she could be bound by a non-disclosure agreement.

In the rest of the interview, Daniels—who described the alleged 2006 affair in detail to In Touch magazine in 2011—acted like “someone talking under a pretty elaborate non-disclosure agreement, while still doing her damnedest to be an engaging talk show guest,” according to the AV Club.

She refused to discuss the alleged affair, even when Kimmel read excerpts from the In Touch interview and tried to communicate using puppets. In a pre-recorded segment, she held up a doll of herself wearing a gag when Kimmel held up a Trump doll.

Following the interview, her attorney told the Guardian that it was definitely Daniels’ signature on the statement, and she was just “having fun on Kimmel and being her normal playful self.”

Edited via  Newser.

About Post Author

Michael John Scott

Mr. Scott is a political junkie, and animal lover. He is also a U.S. Army veteran, career law enforcement executive, and university professor. Did I mention he loves dogs? A lot?
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Did you like this? Share it:
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rachael
4 years ago

That was a weird appearance. A nothingburger.

Michael45
4 years ago

I expect she had signed a NDA when given the $130k and was warned before going on Kimmel.

jess
Reply to  Michael45
4 years ago

I wonder, because when it happened she spoke out loud about it for an interview so it’s out there already for all to see.

4 years ago

The real question is how can Trump claim to not like sex with women who have given birth yet be okay with a porno queen whom by nature of the business and the instruments her co-stars wield has experienced some large things herself.

jess
Reply to  Joe Hagstrom
4 years ago

Not only that Joe but she said during the interview back in the day it was generic sex they had. Sorry, not sorry but if I am going to be fucking a porn star I don’t want generic sex, I want what a porn star is capable of doing in his movies sex.

jess
4 years ago

Jimmy should have just asked her to leave after the first question she did not answer and tell his audience, nope not going there with this one, it was not useful at all.

Previous post Leaving the EU and How Britain’s Anti-Brexiteers Just Don’t Get It
Next post Why You Should Drink Coffee
6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x