Trump’s Itchy Twitter Finger Goes After Mitt Romney

by Michael John Scott

We all knew it wouldn’t take long before the White House’s Chief Baby responded to Utah Sen.-elect Mitt Romney’s very public rebuke. 

The baby tweeted,

“Here we go with Mitt Romney, but so fast! Question will be, is he a Flake?”

…referring to outgoing Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake, known for his own criticism of Trump.

“I hope not,”

Trump continued in his tweet.

“Would much prefer that Mitt focus on Border Security and so many other things where he can be helpful. I won big, and he didn’t. He should be happy for all Republicans. Be a TEAM player & WIN!”

Although Romney’s opinion piece gave the president props for certain policy initiatives, it took him to task for his “glaring” shortcomings, particularly in regard to “presidential leadership in qualities of character.”

Whether Romney responds to Trump remains to be seen:

In his op-ed, he noted,

“I do not intend to comment on every tweet or fault.”

What a mess we’re in, thanks to the election of Donald Trump.

Did you like this? Share it:
Posted by on January 2, 2019. Filed under NEWS I FIND INTERESTING. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Back to Main Page

2 Responses to Trump’s Itchy Twitter Finger Goes After Mitt Romney

  1. Glenn R. Geist Reply

    January 2, 2019 at 11:24 am

    While I love it when any Republican rebukes him, I remember how even after Trump called him all kinds of names, he showed up with his knee pads when Trump suggested he might have some job for him – ironing his toilet paper or something like that.

    None of these people have the backbone of an earthworm.

    • Michael John Scott Reply

      January 2, 2019 at 4:13 pm

      I remember that damning picture. I didn’t have much respect for Romney to begin with but after that I realized he was just another Republican sycophant. His latest attack on Trump is just the first volley in his move to go after Trump in the primary, which, I suppose, wouldn’t be all that bad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.