Bill Gates Worried About ‘Once-in-a-Century Pandemic’

Read Time:1 Minute, 48 Second
A man with a face mask walks on a street in Duesseldorf, Germany, Monday, March 2, 2020. (AP Photo/Martin Meissner)

There are lots of liberals out there who hate Bill Gates for one reason: he’s wealthy, something that is anathema to many hard lefties.  So, when he speaks they tend not to listen.

Here’s the summary of a Bill Gates’ story from Newser:

Bill Gates has spent his post-tech life focusing on health crises, and in an essay at the New England Journal of Medicine he offers some sobering thoughts about the coronavirus. He points out that health experts have been warning for some time that a pandemic rivaling the 1918 flu “was a matter not of if but of when.”

Now comes the coronavirus. “In the past week, Covid-19 has started behaving a lot like the once-in-a-century pathogen we’ve been worried about,” he writes. “I hope it’s not that bad, but we should assume it will be until we know otherwise.”

For one thing, despite those who say otherwise, the coronavirus is indeed deadlier than the flu, writes Gates. Preliminary estimates suggest a fatality risk of 1%, far higher than the 0.1% risk with the seasonal flu.

For another, the coronavirus seems to spread “quite efficiently,” he writes. The average person who is infected passes it on to two or three others, and those with mild or even no symptoms appear to be capable of passing it along as well.

Gates’ main point isn’t to spread alarm but to urge governments to take action now on a range of fronts. For example, developed nations should help their poorer counterparts prepare, which he sees as a crucial investment in terms of containment.

“In addition, we need to build a system that can develop safe, effective vaccines and antivirals, get them approved, and deliver billions of doses within a few months after the discovery of a fast-moving pathogen,” writes Gates.

The logistics of that are daunting, and Gates runs through the details and offers solutions. Read his full column.

Edited via Newser.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 years ago

You are quite right. As I and endless others have said, these aren’t liberals but Bolsheviks, Maoists, Jacobins, out to destroy what passes for aristocracy in America. Can we call it financial racism.

It’s not just Gates. The went after the Clintons because they’ve also saved many, many lives with a legitimate and well run charity that fights disease rather than buys things for the president.

The presumption once again is that property is theft whether or not it’s earned or given away to the poor. Will we ever see an honest banner like “broke like us”

Reply to  Glenn Geist
4 years ago

I never understood this whole ‘money is bad’ dynamic when most people would love to have money or at least a lot more money than they have. I think it boils down to one thing: jealousy.

Previous post Militant BLM Protesters Storm Amy Klobuchar’s Last Venue
Next post Why Is the CDC Hiding Coronavirus Test and Death Numbers?
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x