Why Is Jesus In My Park? Balancing Public Spaces and the Presence of Religion

Read Time:2 Minute, 49 Second

The H20 church (its real name) prays in the city’s park every Sunday. I can’t help but wonder if they aren’t praying for water. Anyway, it means I can’t walk my dog without hearing the droning of the preacher man, standing in the ‘bandstand,’ laying on hands to those in foldup chairs. This irritates me because I don’t think religion belongs in public spaces. Jesus is entitled to his own space, meaning His building, land, tent, etc., not in the park for which I pay mightily in taxes.

I understand the intersection of public spaces, personal beliefs, and religious activities often creates a tricky balancing act. It is a challenge that nations worldwide wrestle with, particularly in countries like ours, where the separation of church and state is fundamental but often ignored by evangelical fanatics. How do we balance respecting individual religious freedom and ensuring that public spaces remain secular and accessible to all, regardless of their beliefs?

When it comes to the issue of religious activities in public parks – a place commonly shared and funded by taxpayers like me I suppose I must acknowledge the varying perspectives and emotions tied to it.

As a taxpayer, I might feel that religious activities, such as church-holding services, infringe upon public spaces’ secular nature. It feels alienating and uncomfortable, particularly since I don’t subscribe to the religious beliefs practiced or any for that matter. As a place of relaxation, recreation, and dog walking, the park is essential to my quality of life, and I feel that worshipping Jesus disrupts this.

I should remember that public parks are generally designated spaces for community use. This includes a wide range of activities, including recreational sports, community gatherings, cultural festivals, and dog walking, but praying to Jesus in an organized fashion. Isn’t that what churches are for? The key to determining the appropriateness of these activities often lies in whether the space is being monopolized or whether the activity is excluding or disrupting others. OK. It’s the middle of the park, with limited parking, several playgrounds for children, a few grills and tables, and a bike path.

Religious freedom may be a foundational principle in some societies, such as Pakistan, Iran, and the rest of the ‘stans.’ However, does the right to practice one’s faith in various settings, including public ones, infringe upon the rights of others? I sure as fuck think so.

That said, these activities in a public park are irritating me. As a result, it might be worth raising the issue with local authorities. Perhaps they can tell me why religious activities are conducted in the city-owned park.

Ultimately, navigating the intersection of public spaces and religious activities requires a delicate balance. It’s about upholding religious freedom, which there’s far too much of already while ensuring that public spaces remain inclusive, comfortable, and accessible to everyone in the community. It’s about dialogue, understanding, and compromise, allowing everyone to enjoy and benefit from our shared public spaces, which is precisely what I want to do on Sunday. If Jesus wanted to skateboard, that would be OK because the park has a place for that, but not for a church.

In closing, why the ‘H20 church? Does it have some hidden relation to water? Why not the NaCl church, you know, salt? The salt of the earth and all that. Weird. It’s all rather weird.

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
100 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Glenn Geist
11 months ago

Since I see religious institutions as a business – and worse a for-profit but not-for-taxes business, I agree it doesn’t belong on property owned by the people and maintained at the public expense. I’m not so much against a guy on a soapbox, but I don’t see preaching as a public benefit at all.

11 months ago

Looks like neither of us is dead yet. At any rate, I had a Republican friend who was pissed about gang tags all over one of OUR public parks. We’re walking along arguing about Trump, and he’s complaining about all the gang tags.

We get to one. It’s a yellow arrow pointing down, and H20, also in yellow. My friend says, “See that? I’ve never heard of the H20s.” I said, “Yeah. The only gang that can beat them is the NACLs.”

He didn’t get it. Glad to see you’re still at it. I’ll submit something soon.

Previous post Forbidden Pages: Billy’s Journey Through Banned Books
Next post Caught in the Orange Shadow: Billy’s Search for Understanding
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x