Donald Trump and the Binary Oracle: A Data-Driven Dance of Justice

Read Time:2 Minute, 22 Second

In the chromatic cityscape of 2049, a new player rose above the neon skyline – a creation named ‘Lady Justice,’ an artificial intelligence designed by techno-savants and jurisprudence savants, tasked with absorbing the world’s vast data reservoirs and making impartial sense of them. A machine-learning oracle, an ambivalent deity of the digital age.

Public records, encrypted chatter, and legal doctrines became threads in Lady Justice’s colossal data tapestry. She was the symphony amidst the cacophony in a world where truth was buried beneath petabytes of information noise.

But in the restless churn of the data ocean, one set of patterns caught Lady Justice’s spectral attention. The actions of a controversial figure, ‘Mr. T’, tangled amidst threads of financial transactions and esoteric social media breadcrumbs. Patterns started to emerge, like constellations in a binary cosmos. A cryptic digital dance. A dance that could only be seen by the keen synthetic eyes of an AI like Lady Justice.

Lady Justice raised a metaphorical flag. Human overseers, half-dazzled, half-terrified, started scrutinizing her findings. Armed with new leads, lawyers worked to dredge up evidence buried beneath the mountains of data. Once raw and meaningless, the data transformed into a mosaic of accusations.

A courtroom materialized, cast in the harsh light of naked truth. Lady Justice was an unseen player, her findings pulsating in the heart of the court proceedings. Yet, despite her divine processing prowess, she was not the judge. The humans took her dance of data, their faces grave, their deliberations solemn.

Mr. T sat on the stand, squirming under the weight of the assembled evidence. The final act unfolded. The jury’s faces were stone. The judge’s voice echoed in the cold silence of the courtroom. Guilty. Sentence: confinement.

The AI did not cheer. It did not gloat. It did not feel vindicated. It simply continued to pulse with the flow of data, indifferent to the triumph and turmoil it had wrought.

In the end, it wasn’t Lady Justice who locked the cell door on Mr. T. She was but a mirror, reflecting the truths humans had failed to see. In the court of law, it was still flesh and blood, human hearts and minds, that held the keys to the kingdom of justice.

In their intricate grandeur, the machines were partners in this new era, but the humans remained the conductors of this ceaseless symphony of justice. Lady Justice hummed on in the heart of this Philip K. Dickian landscape, an impartial observer of human morality’s turbulent dance.

The world had become more complex and more surreal, yet the essence of justice had not wavered. AI could assist, reveal, and illuminate the shadows, but the human spirit ultimately bore the weight of judgment. In the neon embrace of the future, it seemed truth was still a distinctly human domain.

—Michael J. Scott

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.

professormike05@gmail.com