US relies on Afghan “Robin Hood”

Read Time:55 Second

Abdul Razziq is illiterate and corrupt. His network skims custom duties, facilitates drug trafficking, and smuggles contraband across the Pakistani border. Yet the 32-year-old is also essential to the war effort, bringing the kind of security to the city of Spin Boldak that has so eluded the US elsewhere. “If we didn’t have him, we’d be screwed,” one US Army officer tells the Washington Post. “It wouldn’t be this quiet.”

Razziq is a colonel in the Afghan Border Police, but in town people call him General Razziq, and shower him with adulation. “He’s like this Robin Hood figure who appears from nowhere, takes money and uses it to meet [the people’s] needs,” says one US infantry commander. Some in NATO want to oust him to crack down on graft, while others want to reform him into a more savory ally. But British Maj. Gen. Nick Carter says Razziq is absolutely necessary. “Is it a long-term solution? That’s for others to decide,” he says. “But it is a pragmatic solution. … He’s Afghan good-enough.

Enhanced by Zemanta

About Post Author

Professor Mike

Professor Mike is a left-leaning, dog loving, political junkie. He has written dozens of articles for Substack, Medium, Simily, and Tribel. Professor Mike has been published at Smerconish.com, among others. He is a strong proponent of the environment, and a passionate protector of animals. In addition he is a fierce anti-Trumper. Take a moment and share his work.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
13 years ago

That is a fine line to walk though, we see that with Hamas, helping the people while doing bad things otherwise.

lazersedge
13 years ago

Hell, anything that works and gets us out of there.

Previous post States push to allow guns in bars
Next post “The Social Network” divided generations
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x